The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

  • Business

    Parents buying homes for kids at college

  • Politics

    Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

  • National

    Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Friday, May 9, 2008

The price of war?

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  • EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  • EDITORIAL: Obama has a 'Pet Goat' moment
  • EDITORIAL: Greedy autoworkers

By

Is the Iraq war economically unaffordable? Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has become something of a cause celebre among the antiwar set with the publication of his recent book, "The Three-Trillion Dollar War." Mr. Stiglitz's economic criticisms of the war have been echoed by those in Congress who would like to downsize the U.S. military presence in Iraq. The war is criticized for having boosted the price of oil, turned our economy toward recession and saddled future generations with a legacy of debt.

Has it? Start with the charge that the Iraq war has boosted the price of oil on world markets. According to Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution, who has been following key benchmarks of the war, Iraq's oil production has returned to pre-war levels. Before the war, it was no greater than 2.5 million barrels per day. As of February 2008, it was 2.4 million barrels per day. The rising price of oil, then, isn't due to supply disruptions from Iraq. Rather, it's because of a one-two punch of rising global demand and the weakening dollar. (Oil is priced in dollars in global trading.)

As for whether the Iraq war has turned the U.S. economy toward recession, economists define a recession as two straight quarters of negative economic growth. According to the Department of Commerce, real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for the most recent quarter of reporting, the first quarter of 2008, was 0.6 percent. That's below trend, but it's not recessionary. It was 0.6 percent for the preceding quarter, and 4.9 percent for the quarter before that. The slowdown in the growth rate is attributed by economists to the fallout from the recent housing crunch, not the ongoing cost of a war that's entering its sixth year.

Economists understand that the measure of an economy's ability to sustain anything — defense spending, budget deficits, health care costs, etc. — is the fraction of GDP it represents. The Iraq war's cost of $12 billion per month, or $150 billion per year, equates to 1.0 percent of GDP. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reports that U.S. defense expenditures currently account for 4.0 percent of GDP. That includes the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as all the non-wartime activities of the Department of Defense. Toss out the extra 1.0 percent of GDP for the Iraq war, and today's share of GDP going to defense would be 3.0 percent. That's where the share bottomed out under President Clinton during the late 1990s. By way of comparison, it was 4.9 percent under President Carter in 1980 and 9.5 percent under President Johnson in 1968 (the year of the Tet Offensive in Vietnam). Even with the Iraq war, today's defense share of GDP is lower than at any point during the Cold War.

Mr. Stiglitz links the Iraq war to President Bush's tax cuts and faults the two for the increase in the federal budget deficit. But grouping the war with the tax cuts is a neat device to obscure the fact that the deficit impact of the tax cuts greatly exceeded that of the war. The Iraq war costs $150 billion per year. The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts together cost close to twice that. According to CBO, President Bush's tax cuts reduced federal revenue as a share of GDP from 20.9 percent in 2000 to 18.8 percent in 2007. Had the revenue share of GDP remained at 20.9 percent in 2007 — sans the tax cuts — revenues would have been nearly $300 billion greater. Now, that simple calculation doesn't include the economic-feedback effects from the tax cuts.

Supply-side economists maintain that tax cuts boost the economy's long-term growth prospects by improving incentives to work, save and invest. Mr. Stiglitz isn't known within the economics profession as being a supply-sider, though. For him to hitch the war to the tax cuts in faulting it for the rising federal budget deficit is a bit disingenuous.

During the Civil War, Robert E. Lee famously said, "It is well that war is so awful, lest we grow too fond of it." War is an ugly business. The decision to go to war is not one to be taken lightly. From a purely economic standpoint, however, the Iraq war is not unaffordable relative to an annual U.S. GDP of $14 trillion. To suggest otherwise is to obscure the debate over the war rather than to contribute to it.

Chris Duquette is an economist and spent six months in 2006-07 with the U.S. military counter-IED staff at Camp Victory in Baghdad, Iraq. He is also a Navy veteran of the Gulf War.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
More Top Stories »
  1. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  2. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  3. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  4. Can the 10th Amendment save us?
  5. 60 Plus leader: Senior 'tsunami' coming

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Making fun of faith
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Obama's new world order
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  2. Martial mythologies
  3. EDITORIAL: The grass roots keep growing
  4. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  5. Wife of envoy raises funds to help women, children

Most Commented

  1. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  2. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. 60 Plus leader: Senior 'tsunami' coming
  2. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  4. Panel OKs climate-change bill without GOP
  5. EDITORIAL: Greedy autoworkers

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    He Said, She Said Week 9

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.