DRIESSEN: Second thoughts on warming

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By Paul Driessen

COMMENTARY:

President-elect Barack Obama wants to phase out coal-based electricity generation, switch to renewable energy and follow Europe's lead on climate change. That could prove difficult.

Coal generates half of all U.S. electricity. Wind provides less than 2 percent of all electricity and cannot be relied on when it's needed. Europe's lead can't even be defined, much less followed.

Nearly all EU countries signed the Kyoto Protocol and agreed to slash greenhouse gas emissions to 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. As of 2008, however, many of their emissions are well above their Kyoto targets. Italy's were 14 percent above, Portugal's 17 percent, Denmark's 19 percent, Austria's 30 percent, Spain's 37 percent. Whose "environmentally responsible" lead should we follow?

By comparison, U.S. emissions are some 23 percent above target levels we would have agreed to, had we signed Kyoto. But America's carbon dioxide emission growth rate has been just 0.2 percent per year since 2000, notes University of Colorado climatologist Richard Keen.

Last year, the European Union solved its predicament by agreeing to slash emissions 20 percent by 2020. Now, because of the financial crisis, many EU countries and industries want to back away from even that. Perhaps they will agree to 30 percent by 2030 (or 40 percent by 2040). Should America follow this elastic example?

In 2006, Chancellor Angela Merkel promised to eliminate coal and nuclear power in Germany. Today she wants to keep nuclear power, build new coal-fired plants, and shield chemical, steel, manufacturing, cement and auto industries, by reducing emission goals or providing free cap-and-trade permits.

Austria and Italy also want EU climate restrictions eased to help industries that are struggling with high energy prices, the economic crisis, and competition from less regulated overseas competitors that rely on coal for power generation and easily undercut European production costs.

Italian ministers have called the EU climate action plan "politically correct garbage" that "would kill any economic improvement" and "achieve very modest environmental benefits" - on the order of reducing projected global warming by 0.1 degrees or less. Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi insists any EU climate deal be revisited in late 2009, after its real economic and employment costs have been fully analyzed.

Poland and other former Eastern Bloc nations strongly oppose any EU climate change plan that doesn't exempt them, because they depend on coal for up to 90 percent of their electricity and on Russia for up to 97 percent of their natural gas. They were held back for 50 years under Communist dictators - and now are loathe to let Brussels dictate future economic development.