Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Turkey derides U.S. for war on terror

Supporters of radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr burn American flags as they demonstrate Friday in Baghdad against a proposed security pact between Iraq and the United States. (Associated Press)Supporters of radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr burn American flags as they demonstrate Friday in Baghdad against a proposed security pact between Iraq and the United States. (Associated Press)

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Friday that “the situation in Iraq is not positive at all,” contrary to U.S. claims of progress after five years of conflict.

Mr. Erdogan, in Washington to attend the Group of 20 financial summit, said Afghanistan was “another disastrous event” and that the Bush administration had spent more than $500 billion in Iraq and Afghanistan without stabilizing either country.

Bipartisan in his criticism, the Turkish leader also chided President-elect Barack Obama for openly promising to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq within 16 months. It would have been better for Mr. Obama to have kept his timetable secret, Mr. Erdogan said.

Turkey opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and its parliament failed to approve the transit of U.S. forces from bases in Turkey into Iraq at the time. Since then, however, Turkey has become a major supplier for U.S. forces. It fears a U.S. withdrawal could lead to even more instability in Iraq and a possible partition of the country that would aggravate Turkey’s problems with a large Kurdish minority.

Mr. Erdogan, speaking at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, said he had visited both Iraq and Afghanistan and “I couldn’t help but wonder where does all that money [provided by the United States] go?” He said Turkey, instead of giving money, was building schools and hospitals and providing training to police and local governments.

“We are investing, not just paying,” he said. “Instead of giving money, we prefer to give something tangible.”

Mr. Erdogan said a too-quick withdrawal from Iraq was a bad idea because Iraqi “law enforcement has not yet matured” and local administration is also not ready to assume responsibility. Transitioning from a “totalitarian mentality … is not an easy task,” he said.

State Department spokesman Robert Wood said Mr. Erdogan’s assessment of Iraq was overly pessimistic.

“Iraq’s infrastructure, as well as the security situation in the country, is improving every day,” Mr. Wood said. “While a lot of work remains to be done, the Iraqi government is making great progress in delivering services to its people. Iraqi security forces now control 13 of the country’s 18 provinces, demonstrating Iraq’s growing ability to provide for its own security.”

Mark Parris, a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey and director of a Turkey project at Brookings, said Turkish leaders “after not wanting us to go in [to Iraq], don’t want us to go out too quickly.”

He added that the Ankara government is displaying a new “self-confidence” after a string of political victories at home and mediation efforts in the region - between Israel and Syria, with Iran and in the Caucasus. Turkey also recently won election to a two-year seat on the United Nations Security Council.

“They believe they’re better at [mediation] than the clunky Westerners who press all the wrong buttons,” Mr. Parris said.

Henry Barkey, a Turkey expert and head of the department of international relations at Lehigh University, agreed that the Turkish government was showing “a new assertiveness.”

“We are a serious power and we know some things better than you do,” was how Mr. Barkey summed up the Turkish attitude.

Mr. Erdogan leads the Justice and Development Party (AKP), an organization with strong Islamic roots that won 46.6 percent of the votes in elections in July 2007. An attempt by secular parties to outlaw the AKP failed earlier this year when the country’s Constitutional Court voted 6-5 to disband the party and bar its leaders from politics for five years. Under court procedures, seven votes would have been needed.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Author
Barbara Slavin

Barbara Slavin

Barbara Slavin is assistant managing editor for World and National Security at The Washington Times and the author of a 2007 book on Iran, titled “Bitter Friends, Bosom Enemies: Iran, the U.S. and the Twisted Path to Confrontation.” Before joining The Times in July 2008, she was senior diplomatic reporter for USA Today. She has accompanied three secretaries of state ...

You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Ingredients for Healthy Living

          Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

          Rights So Divine

          Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.