- The Washington Times - Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. on Monday signaled that he will leave at least half of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout fund for the incoming Obama administration to spend, as skeptical lawmakers received their first update on the massive rescue plan approved last month.

A separate $25 billion bailout of the beleaguered U.S. auto industry stumbled even before it got out of the gate in this week’s lame-duck congressional session, as rank-and-file Senate Democrats backed away from the plan and the Bush administration ripped the idea of tapping the bank bailout to aid Detroit.

“We’re surprised that Senate Democrats would propose a bailout that fails to require automakers to make the hard decisions needed to restructure and become viable,” said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.

Congressional sources said the Bush administration has informed lawmakers that it will probably not be tapping the second $350 billion under the program before leaving office in January. Under the terms of the emergency legislation approved in early October, Congress has the right to veto the second wave of spending.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto declined to discuss the administration’s plans, saying the program decisions were being left to Mr. Paulson.

Treasury has spent or committed about $290 billion of the first tranche of $350 billion under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

Mr. Paulson told the Wall Street Journal that he preferred to keep the TARP money in reserve for the next administration.

“I’m going to do what we need to do to keep the system strong, but I’m not going to start up new things unless they’re necessary, unless they make great sense,” he said. “I want to preserve the firepower, the flexibility we have now and those that come after us will have.”

Treasury is carefully couching its position out of concern that financial markets will react negatively to any decision to forgo the additional funds for two months until President-elect Barack Obama takes office.

Many on Wall Street point out there is no guarantee that the financial situation for banks won’t get significantly worse in coming weeks, particularly as defaults on credit cards and prime mortgages rise. In that event, the Treasury might need the additional money to help more banks and financial institutions.

Although originally advertised by Mr. Paulson as a means to buy up “toxic” mortgages and other assets poisoning the balance sheets of major banks and financial firms, the bulk of the money to date has been used to recapitalize banks with taxpayer-financed purchases of their stock.

The shift has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill.

“We have some questions about the significant alternations that have been made in the implementation” of the bailout, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters before a private briefing on the bailout with Mr. Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke.

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland said after the meeting that the Democrats “made it very, very clear that we thought that [Mr. Paulson] ought to be much more vigorous immediately in addressing the issue of how we can stabilize and stanch the continuing daily foreclosures.”

Mr. Paulson, senior banking regulators and bank industry lobbyists are to testify Tuesday morning before the House Financial Services Committee.

Detroit’s Big Three - General Motors, Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC - have lobbied hard to get government aid, assisted by the United Auto Workers union.

But the plan has come under fire from all sides as lawmakers struggle to move legislation in the brief lame-duck session. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said he expected Republicans unhappy with the auto-rescue idea to block the bill in a procedural vote scheduled for Friday.

Sen. Bill Nelson took the Senate floor to lament that the Democrats’ plan offers none of the safeguards included in the government’s 1979 bailout of Chrysler, in which the new chief executive officer, Lee Iacocca, gave Congress a detailed restructuring plan before the money was approved.

“When we look out across the landscape of the automotive industry, we’ve got to ask, ‘Where are the Lee Iacoccas?’” the Florida Democrat said.

Reservations also were voiced by Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana and Claire McCaskill of Missouri.

Mr. Hoyer said that House Democratic leaders only briefly discussed a possible automaker bailout during their hourlong meeting with Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bernanke and that there was a “sense that bankruptcy was not the preferable alternative.”

President Bush has pushed for lawmakers to free up a $25 billion loan already approved to help automotive industry retool to build more fuel-efficient cars. The White House wants them to remove the restrictions on how the money is used and send the companies the cash.

Mr. Reid moved to pass the automotive bailout either with an extension of unemployment benefits or as part of a $100 billion economic-stimulus package, conceding that neither measure is expected to pass.

“It doesn’t mean we should not try,” Reid spokesman Jim Manley said.

The bill includes the same aid to states, extended unemployment benefits and New Deal-style projects to build roads, bridges and schools that died in the Senate in September. Before the auto-industry bailout was added to the package, it carried a $61 billion price tag.

Democrats say they might have to be satisfied passing just the extension of unemployment benefits, waiting to take up more ambitious measures when they return in January with a larger majority in both chambers and Mr. Obama in the White House.

• Sean Lengell and Patrice Hill contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide