The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine

  • National

    U.S. links 8 to Somali terrorist group

  • Business

    Home sales surge 10.1 percent in October

  • Local

    Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll

  • Politics

    S.C. governor faces 37 ethics violations

  • National

    China holds lawyer who tried to see Obama

  • World

    Israel-Hamas prisoner swap talks advance

Home » Opinion » Letters

Friday, November 21, 2008

LETTER TO EDITOR: Christians and blacks harassed

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Protesters hold signs in front of the Mormon Church during a "No on Prop 8" march and rally in Los Angeles to protest the church's monetary support of Prop 8, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2008. Legal experts said it is unclear whether an attempt by gay-rights activists to overturn California's new ban on gay marriage has any chance of success, and whether the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed in California over the past four months are in any danger.

More Letters Stories

  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Bigamous government
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: When family ties die
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Seeing red
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: The new ICE age

By

I agree with what Tara Wall wrote ("A marriage mandate," Op-Ed, Tuesday).

The gay-rights folks are harassing Christian groups and blacks for having supported Proposition 8 in California and the traditional view that marriage is between one man and one woman. The vote in favor was higher than that for President-elect Barack Obama, a man whose election is considered a mandate for change. The votes in California and elsewhere on marriage were a vote for change back to the traditional meaning of marriage.

As the voting is over, only meanspiritedness can be the explanation for the gay activists' behavior. If they want to target any religion, it should be Islam, but that is the only religion the left dares not attack, even though Islam believes the only good homosexual is a dead one. This belief is actually practiced in many majority-Islamic countries. In Somalia, they also stone to death 13-year-old rape victims for adultery.

Secularists believe religious beliefs should not be considered on political issues, particularly those that conflict with their views. This is a radical view, as most of our moral and legal beliefs come from our Judeo-Christian background.

I propose a new law for states to consider: The government would cease issuing marriage licenses. If you wanted something the state would treat like a marriage license, you would enter into a partnership contract or use the domestic-partnership laws many states now have. Under a contract, the parties would be free to negotiate its terms, including the number of partners (not polygamy, since not a marriage), and how the partnership may be dissolved. Child custody and support would still be state-law matters. Religious and secular groups could marry people, but that would be controlled by the group's rules and would not be enforceable in our state or federal courts.

My proposal treats all sexual orientations equally, and it has historical and legal basis because marriage was once considered a purely religious matter.

WAYNE L. JOHNSON

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, Navy (retired)

Alexandria

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Top Republican lawmakers not invited to State Dinner
  2. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  3. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

Most Shared

  1. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  4. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  5. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  2. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  3. VMI faces probe into sexism
  4. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  5. The United Socialist States of America

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Top Republican lawmakers not invited to State Dinner
  5. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
More Top Stories »
  1. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  2. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  3. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Mason returns

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.