Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

LETTER TO EDITOR: Christians and blacks harassed

Protesters hold signs in front of the Mormon Church during a "No on Prop 8" march and rally in Los Angeles to protest the church's monetary support of Prop 8, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2008. Legal experts said it is unclear whether an attempt by gay-rights activists to overturn California's new ban on gay marriage has any chance of success, and whether the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed in California over the past four months are in any danger. Protesters hold signs in front of the Mormon Church during a “No on Prop 8” march and rally in Los Angeles to protest the church’s monetary support of Prop 8, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2008. Legal experts said it is unclear whether an attempt by gay-rights activists to overturn California’s new ban on gay marriage has any chance of success, and whether the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed in California over the past four months are in any danger.

I agree with what Tara Wall wrote (“A marriage mandate,” Op-Ed, Tuesday).

The gay-rights folks are harassing Christian groups and blacks for having supported Proposition 8 in California and the traditional view that marriage is between one man and one woman. The vote in favor was higher than that for President-elect Barack Obama, a man whose election is considered a mandate for change. The votes in California and elsewhere on marriage were a vote for change back to the traditional meaning of marriage.

As the voting is over, only meanspiritedness can be the explanation for the gay activists’ behavior. If they want to target any religion, it should be Islam, but that is the only religion the left dares not attack, even though Islam believes the only good homosexual is a dead one. This belief is actually practiced in many majority-Islamic countries. In Somalia, they also stone to death 13-year-old rape victims for adultery.

Secularists believe religious beliefs should not be considered on political issues, particularly those that conflict with their views. This is a radical view, as most of our moral and legal beliefs come from our Judeo-Christian background.

I propose a new law for states to consider: The government would cease issuing marriage licenses. If you wanted something the state would treat like a marriage license, you would enter into a partnership contract or use the domestic-partnership laws many states now have. Under a contract, the parties would be free to negotiate its terms, including the number of partners (not polygamy, since not a marriage), and how the partnership may be dissolved. Child custody and support would still be state-law matters. Religious and secular groups could marry people, but that would be controlled by the group’s rules and would not be enforceable in our state or federal courts.

My proposal treats all sexual orientations equally, and it has historical and legal basis because marriage was once considered a purely religious matter.

WAYNE L. JOHNSON

Commander, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, Navy (retired)

Alexandria

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • President Obama speaks Feb. 13, 2012, about the "Community College to Career Fund" and his 2013 budget at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale, Va. (Associated Press)

    Obama unveils fiscal 2013 budget proposal

    By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times

  • President Barack Obama speaks about the "Community College to Career Fund" and his 2013 budget, Monday, Feb. 13, 2012, at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale, Va. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

    Social Security reserves forecast to run dry in 2022

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** This photo from Dec. 13, 2011, shows workers inside Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. (Associated Press)

    Arizona lawmakers: No more teachers’ dirty words

    By Ben Wolfgang - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now