The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Investigation

Federal judge orders five Gitmo detainees freed

By Tom Ramstack | Friday, November 21, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen
UPDATE:

A federal judge in Washington on Thursday freed five Guantanamo Bay detainees accused by government prosecutors of supporting al Qaeda's military efforts against the U.S. military and its allies.

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon said the five Algerian terrorism suspects could not be held indefinitely as "enemy combatants" and that the government failed to prove the classified document used as evidence against them was reliable.

He directed that the five men be released "forthwith" and urged the government not to appeal. The men have been held for almost seven years. This is the first civilian court ruling for terror suspects who are challenging their detention.

One of the men to be released is Lakhdar Boumediene, whose landmark Supreme Court case in June gave detainees the right to challenge their imprisonment in the facility, which was set up in 2002 after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The judge ordered Mr. Boumediene and four other detainees to be released immediately, though he did not reveal the conditions of their release.

Officials in Bosnia, meanwhile, have already agreed to allow the detainees to enter that country - which had been their adopted home before they were imprisoned.

For a sixth detainee, who will not be released, Judge Leon said the evidence showed he used false names and fake passports to travel between countries while helping al Qaeda operatives prepare for battle against the U.S. military in Afghanistan.

The case against the men focused on whether the evidence showed they were "enemy combatants" under a definition Judge Leon issued on Oct. 27. For the five ordered freed Thursday, "the government relies exclusively on the evidence of a classified document from an unnamed source," the judge said.

He said his ruling in this case is unique and may not to apply to most of the other 250 Guantanamo detainees.

All six detainees had asserted that detaining them was unlawful under the U.S. Constitution and international law. They were originally detained by Bosnian authorities in late 2001 and sent to Guantanamo a few months later - suspected of planning a bomb attack on the U.S. Embassy in Bosnia.

Prosecutors later said they would no longer use allegations of a bomb plot to justify holding the men.

"In the last two months, they dropped about every charge" as weaknesses in the government's evidence became apparent, said Stephen H. Oleskey, a lawyer for the detainees.

"It collapsed in front of the judge and that's what you heard today," Mr. Oleskey said.

The Justice Department blamed the court ruling to free five of the six detainees on a lack of guidance from the Supreme Court and Congress on procedural rules.

"These cases present extraordinary circumstances where wartime enemies have been captured abroad and are being detained based often on the same sort of classified intelligence relied upon by the military in conducting wartime operations," said Peter Carr, Justice Department spokesman. "Today´s decision is perhaps an understandable consequence of the fact that neither the Supreme Court nor Congress has provided rules on how these habeas corpus cases should proceed in this unprecedented context."

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. Chaos theory -- and practice
  8. Young Cons a YouTube surprise hit
  9. Ouster a threat for Md. GOP chairman
  10. Jurors view tape of Jefferson taking briefcase

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.