Home > Opinion > Commentary

THOMSON: Chavez's fraud game

By John R. Thomson | Sunday, November 23, 2008

Article
Comments ()

The kinds and extent of fraud already being applied by the Venezuelan government to the crucial elections today are unprecedented. Having originally won election to the presidency in 1999 in a remarkably clean contest, Hugo Chavez has progressively moved the process to one of unmitigated electoral larceny.

Election irregularities are nothing new in the United States or virtually any democratic country, but Venezuela's pilfer process starts well before the day the votes are cast and counted.

In August, 400 opposition candidates for state and municipal posts were initially declared ineligible for trumped-up reasons ranging from poorly prepared applications to corruption charges. The predictable reaction to such a blatantly bogus move resulted in 276 candidates finally being blocked from competing.

It seems possible the climbdown from 400 was preplanned, the government having taken its lead from Iran, which has regularly reinstated roughly 65 percent of candidates initially declared ineligible, in a move designed to show how reasonable the authorities have been in vetting prospective candidates.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/news/stories/346999/

Once a number of opposition candidates were eliminated, Mr. Chavez's next public move was to announce he would withhold national government financial support from states that elected opposition governors. With state-owned oil monopoly PDVSA providing more than 50 percent of all government income, the threat was clearly designed to have a chilling effect on opposition voters.

The fraud potential on election day is staggering. For example, voting lists have previously been completely jumbled, making it almost impossible to verify a challenged voter's eligibility.

Voting machines and related systems are so rigged that virtually any manipulation is possible. The control center can change results on one or every machine, to accommodate "requirements," as one dissident official told me. Most frightening in Venezuela's police state climate, it is possible for authorities to determine for whom any individual has voted in past and current elections, a fact the government is not disappointed to have leaked to nervous citizens.

Alfredo Weil, dean of election organization and monitoring in Venezuela, is widely respected throughout Latin America. Director general of Venezuela's Supreme Electoral Council from 1974-84 and again in 1993-94, he is a founding director of ESDATA, privately organized to assure clean elections.

Mr. Weil puts the case simply: "Voting is a human right, and the challenge is to assure that each vote is impartial, transparent and secret. This has been enshrined in the United Nations charter, by the Organization of American States and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, but it is not honored in Venezuela. Our computerized voting system violates every one of these three basic tenets of fair democratic voting."

Mr. Weil is confident his organization and thousands of volunteers can capture accurate readings from the country's voting machines, and ESDATA is committed to make the results known to any and every one interested. "But that's the end of the line. They can manipulate the count during the voting day, thereby affecting the final tally; they can spread the word that they know how people vote, thereby destroying the concept of secrecy and intimidating many voters. Unfortunately, they are many, many ways to commit vote fraud."