

“This is not a Democrat bill, this is not a Republican bill — this is our bill,” said Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) following a vote in the Senate on the bailout on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008. The Senate passed the bill with 74 “yays.” (Barbara L. Salisbury / The Washington Times)UPDATED, 5:53 p.m.:
The fate of the $700 billion Wall Street rescue bill hung in the balance Thursday, as President Bush and congressional leaders tried to cobble together a majority in favor of the package ahead of a showdown vote in the House of Representatives Friday.
But with even top House leaders saying they could not predict how the vote will go, a critical bloc of more than a dozen lawmakers who voted against the bailout measure Monday said they were prepared to switch if the initial pay-out under the plan was sharply limited and last-minute pork projects added by the Senate Wednesday night were stripped from the bill.
“We have a critical mass,” said Rep. Steven C. LaTourette, a moderate Ohio Republican who voted against the bill Monday, saying he had talked to 14 other members willing to switch if the amendment he authored was accepted.
Related stories:
• Stocks open lower after Senate vote
• Economic woes spread across nation
• World markets mixed after Senate vote
• U.S. crisis clouds aid to Georgian refugees
“Our core group is sufficient to take care of the margin to pass this bill, if our amendment is ruled in order and passed,” he said. He declined to identify the other lawmakers he said were prepared to switch.
House Democratic leaders were highly reluctant to agree to any changes to the Senate version bill, fearing it might slow down the legislative process even more amid global market uncertainty.
The stock markets tumbled again Thursday, with the Dow Jones index losing 348 points, or 3.2 percent, while the broader Standard & Poor’s index of 500 stocks was off 46 points, or just over 4 percent.
Adding pressure on lawmakers to act, a new government report issued Thursday found that new orders at U.S. factories tumbled by an unexpectedly steep 4 percent in August, the sharpest decline since October 2006.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer both said they were determined to avoid a repeat of the embarrassment Monday, while insisting that inaction was not an option.
“I will be pretty confident we have enough votes before I put [the bill] on the floor,” Mr. Hoyer said.
View Entire Story
Raised in Northern Virginia, David R. Sands received an undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He worked as a reporter for several Washington-area business publications before joining The Washington Times.
At The Times, Mr. Sands has covered numerous beats, including international trade, banking, politics ...
President is violating religious freedom for an ineffective plan

By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times
The Department of Homeland Security program that secures the nation’s chemical plants against terrorist attacks ...

By Ashish Kumar Sen - The Washington Times
The U.S. and Pakistan need to reset their strategic relationship, which has been “burdened” with ...

By Harry Dunphy - Associated Press
World Bank President Robert Zoellick said Wednesday he is stepping down, raising the possibility that ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.