The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine

  • National

    U.S. links 8 to Somali terrorist group

  • Business

    Home sales surge 10.1 percent in October

  • Local

    Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll

  • Politics

    S.C. governor faces 37 ethics violations

  • National

    China holds lawyer who tried to see Obama

  • World

    Israel-Hamas prisoner swap talks advance

Home » Opinion

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

EDITORIAL: New dialogue on abortion

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOTOGRAPHS
Images of babies line a fence in front of Mexico's Supreme Court in Mexico City last year during an anti-abortion protest. Such images haunt the state of California, argues TWT contributor Star Parker.

More Opinion Stories

  • FRIST: Saving children's lives
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Maryland's future is green
  • TELLA: Politics and the Fed
  • EDITORIAL: Congressional Motors

By

During the Democratic primaries and caucuses, Barack Obama said he hoped to find common ground with the pro-life movement in order to reduce the number of abortions. But the issue has not been raised much since then. And yet, there is much common ground which can be found.

An Oct. 9 panel discussion held at the Family Research Center titled "Post-Abortion Mental Health Effect, Awareness, and Politics" provides valuable information. It is well-known that when a woman is pregnant, she has three choices: keep the baby, make an adoption plan, or have an abortion. What is not fully known, however, is that each of these choices has long-term effects for both the parents. An abortion, much like the other two options, is not consequence-free.

A growing body of evidence indicates that women who have an abortion experience adverse psychological effects.

The research reveals that 20 percent to 30 percent of women experience prolonged post-abortion reactions. There are 1.3 million abortions conducted annually in the United States, which means that there is a minimum of 260,000 new cases of mental health problems that emerge every year as a result. Abortion significantly increases risk for depression, anxiety disorders, sleep problems, suicide ideation, suicide and substance abuse. Abortion carries greater mental health risks than unintended pregnancies that are carried to term.

Nonetheless, despite the growing body of such studies - conducted both in America and around the world - the pro-choice movement is still in denial that there is a mental health impact. In fact, the American Psychological Association concludes that the "risk of psychological harm is low."

David Reardon from the Elliott Institute debunks the widespread assumption that abortion is safe.

Many in the scientific community insist that there is no proof of a causal relationship between abortion and mental health problems. But, in Mr. Reardon's view, this runs contrary to even the testimonies of women who have had abortions and who insist that their subsequent disorders are a result of the stress, trauma and grief they experienced from the procedure. According to an automated national telephone poll conducted Feb. 4-5 of 626 respondents, 85 percent of adults said they believe negative emotional problems after an abortion are common to very common, 71 percent stated that more research into this is needed and 70 percent said that abortion doctors should screen women for risk factors that identify women who are more likely to experience emotional disturbances after an abortion.

Thus, the dialogue on abortion can benefit from a fresh perspective: The discussion should not be centered solely on whether girls and women should be permitted to have an abortion. Women must fully grasp that abortion actually comes with mental-health consequences.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  5. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  3. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  4. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  3. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  4. The United Socialist States of America
  5. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
More Top Stories »
  1. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  2. Tea Party react: Conservatives seek litmus test for RNC funding
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  5. Constitutionally, the next time

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  4. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  5. Tea Party react: Conservatives seek litmus test for RNC funding
More Top Stories »
  1. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
  2. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  3. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  4. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  5. Ego of 'O': It's all about him

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Cowboys' James dimissses Landry

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.