



JASON MOTLAGH/THE WASHINGTON TIMES
EYES ON AMERICA: Political science students discuss lecture notes on the effects of the upcoming U.S. presidential election for Pakistan in Lahore.LAHORE, Pakistan | Barack Obama may be winning in the U.S. and most global popularity polls, but he’s a loser in Pakistan.
Dozens of students interviewed at two top universities in this country’s second-largest city, a cultural melting pot known for its liberal leanings, rejected Mr. Obama as “too aggressive,” “irresponsible” and an “enemy of Muslims” whose stated policy toward insurgency-plagued areas would make a bad situation worse.
The anti-Obama sentiment stems from assertions on the campaign trail that the senator from Illinois, if elected president, would authorize U.S. forces to enter Pakistani territory to hunt down Taliban and al Qaeda militants.
That the Democratic nominee is an overwhelming favorite abroad is not lost on the students, nor is the Muslim faith of his grandfather nor his Arabic middle name, Hussein.
But that is not enough to overcome concerns that an Obama administration would target and further destabilize Pakistan.
“The only country he’s talking about bombing today is us,” said Sher Afghen Malik, a political science major at the University of the Punjab, to the approving nods of classmates. “How could we possibly support him?”
Posters made by an Islamic student group have found their way onto campus walls, showing a map of Pakistan clutched by hairy, red-fanged claws wrapped in the American flag.
Khansa Qamar, a member of the school’s model United Nations club, said her peers perceive Mr. Obama “as even more dangerous than George W. Bush” with regard to his stance on Pakistan.
By a show of hands, not one among two dozen students in one class supported the Democratic candidate. A little more than half said they prefer Sen. John McCain of Arizona because the Republican presidential candidate’s statements on Pakistan have been less pointed.
Mr. Obama has stressed that he is not calling for an invasion of Pakistan, but restated in the second presidential debate on Oct. 7 that if its government is “unable or unwilling to hunt down [Osama] bin Laden and take him out, then we should.”
Mr. Obama has distinguished himself from the Bush administration in words but not in deeds. Since mid-August, the U.S. has launched at least a dozen attacks on Pakistani soil, most by unmanned drones.
Still, the candidate’s comments set Pakistan’s media machine on spin cycle, hardening the views of many people who otherwise had been supportive of him, said Khalid Butt, a political science instructor at Government College in Lahore.
“This shows what a few misguided statements can do,” he said.
Much of the rest of the world has a much more positive view of an Obama presidency.
A recent survey of 24 nations by the Pew Global Attitudes Project found high levels of interest in the U.S. election and widespread optimism that American foreign policy “will change for the better” under an Obama administration.
View Entire StoryBy Peter Vincent Pry
Hardening infrastructure will be key to minimizing the threat

By Joceyln Gecker and Thanyarat Doksone - Associated Press
Three Iranians detained after accidentally setting off explosives in Bangkok were planning to attack Israeli ...

By David Hood - The Washington Times
Reston-based LightSquared Inc. vowed Wednesday to continue its fight to establish a national wireless broadband ...

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
George W. Huguely V lied to friends about his whereabouts the night Yeardley Love was ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God