The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Editor Favorites

Candidates slow to detail foreign funds

Lists show large number of questionable sources

By Jim McElhatton and Jennifer Haberkorn | Monday, October 27, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Thousands of political donations from outside the United States have helped fuel the White House bids of Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama, but both campaigns have lagged in disclosing the sources for much of their overseas campaign cash.

Mr. McCain took more than a half-million dollars from donors listing residences outside the U.S. and its territories, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. But his campaign failed to provide disclosures for about a third of those supporters, such as where they work, what they do for a living and in what city they live.

While Mr. Obama's campaign reported such information for all but about 11 percent of the $4.6 million he reported from outside the U.S., numerous donations include incomplete or clearly questionable data.

For example, the Obama campaign reported accepting 37 donations during late August, each for $10, from a donor identified as "JFGGJJFGJ, JGTJ." The same donor listed a residence in "GJTJTJTJTJTJR." Another donor listed "white collar drone" as an occupation. At least 100 Obama donations came from "anonymous."

The lack of disclosure and erroneous donations concern campaign-finance watchdog groups. They say the vetting operations for both the campaigns appear overmatched by the hundreds of millions of dollars flowing through their coffers.

"Both of these campaigns seem overwhelmed by the amount of money they've had to process, and that's reflected anecdotally in the bogus names, excessive contributions and incomplete disclosure on both sides," said Massie Ritsch, spokesman for the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "While it doesn't represent a lot of money, it does undercut the public's trust in the system."

Under FEC rules, presidential campaigns can accept money from overseas from a U.S. citizen, but they're barred by federal law from taking donations from foreign nationals.

Campaigns are also required to make their "best effort" to track down information a donor fails to report, such as hometowns, occupations or employers. Both campaigns list to the FEC many donors' countries as "NA," for not available, and some could include donations from the United States that the campaigns did not properly report.

A review by The Washington Times of more than 15,000 of such donations reported by both campaigns combined - the majority of which went to Mr. Obama - includes just a fraction of the hundreds of millions of dollars in donations given during the presidential campaign. The Times analysis did not include non-itemized contributions - those under $200 - which the FEC does not require to be disclosed.

The McCain campaign allows people to search all of its contributions on its Web site by name, but the Obama campaign does not provide data about donors giving less than $200. In a recent FEC complaint, the Republican National Committee called for an investigation, saying these small donations - totaling more than $200 million - could include money to the Obama campaign from foreign nationals or others giving more than the $2,300 limit to a general campaign.

Continue reading 12Next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Astrid Riecken/The Washington Times

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  6. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  8. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Will you be traveling this 4th of July weekend?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.