- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Justices poised for full docket
The Supreme Court reconvenes next week to hear cases on a wide variety of issues, such as government involvement in religion, “dirty words” on broadcast television and the treatment of Muslim terrorism suspects.
“A wide range of national security issues are percolating in the lower courts and could end up before the Supreme Court this term,” said Brad Berenson, a partner in the Washington law firm of Sidley Austin and an observer of the high court.
One of the 43 cases on the court’s docket is Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a lawsuit brought by Javaid Iqbal, a Pakistani Muslim who says he was mistreated after being imprisoned when the FBI classified him as a “person of interest” with regard to suspected terrorism.
He has sued FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, former Attorney General John Ashcroft and other federal officials, saying their decisions led to what he called the abuse against him. He also says his ethnic origin contributed to his unjustified detention and mistreatment.
Government officials usually are granted “qualified immunity” from prosecution for their policy actions. However, the immunity does not protect them if they knowingly engage in constitutional violations that injure others.
“The real stakes here are going to be the extent to which there is a chilling effect on national security officials,” Mr. Berenson said.
Religious doctrine is on the docket with Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, in which the Supreme Court is asked whether the city of Pleasant Grove, Utah, can display the Ten Commandments on a monument in a city park as a matter of free speech.
The small Summum sect argues that if the city displays the Ten Commandments, it also should display their belief’s Seven Aphorisms. City officials refused, which sent the dispute to the Supreme Court.
“The betting money is that Pleasant Grove will come out ahead in this,” said Tom Goldstein, a partner in the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld.
In Fox Television Stations Inc. v. the Federal Communications Commission, the court agreed to decide whether “fleeting” uses of expletives - or so-called “dirty words” - are acceptable under FCC guidelines.
Currently, the FCC can fine broadcast stations and even take away their licenses if the stations allow the words to be aired.
Television executives argue that the kinds of one-time expletives uttered by celebrities such as Cher and Nicole Richie should be allowed as an insignificant departure from the rule.
In one example, Miss Richie complained to her reality-TV show partner, Paris Hilton, about the difficulty of cleaning cattle manure from her shoes.
In Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, environmentalists say the Navy should not be allowed to use sonar near whales and other marine mammals during training exercises off the coast of California.
Sonar can injure the hearing of the mammals and confuse their internal guidance systems, environmentalists say.
About the Author
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Inside China: Ukraine gets nuke umbrella
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow