The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine

  • National

    U.S. links 8 to Somali terrorist group

  • Business

    Home sales surge 10.1 percent in October

  • Local

    Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll

  • Politics

    S.C. governor faces 37 ethics violations

  • National

    China holds lawyer who tried to see Obama

  • World

    Israel-Hamas prisoner swap talks advance

Home » Opinion » Letters

Monday, September 29, 2008

LETTER TO EDITOR: Wrong on sex ed

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS
Rachel Lloyd (left), founder of Girls Education & Mentoring Services, speaks to one of the group's members on Tuesday in New York. A new bill in the state would help child victims of sexual exploitation instead of prosecuting them.

More Letters Stories

  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Bigamous government
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: When family ties die
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Seeing red
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: The new ICE age

By

In your Tuesday editorial "Sex ed in D.C.," the writer asked whether sex education is more important than health education. The author also asks us to consider why we need sex education, when HIV rates among teens are so "low."

The answer to the question is straightforward: prevention. Youths need to get the lifesaving information they need before they are sexually active. How do we know we need prevention? Because our local rates for sexually active teens and sexually transmitted diseases among teens are figures that should give us all pause.

Youths in the District are sexually active earlier than many of us want to acknowledge: According to the 2007 Youth Risk Behavior survey conducted in D.C. Public Schools, 30.6 percent of middle-school students said they already were sexually active. Frighteningly, 10 percent of those had had sexual intercourse before age 11. Between 2003 and 2007, reported syphilis cases among adolescents ages 15 to 24 increased by 233 percent, and reported chlamydia cases in that age group increased by 94 percent. Women younger than 18 are physiologically more vulnerable to sexually transmitted diseases, and the presence of a sexually transmitted disease makes a person more vulnerable to HIV infection if the infected person comes into contact with HIV.

I agree with the statement that "health education in the early grades should focus on just that - health and nutrition." In fact, that's what the District's health standards dictate. Metro TeenAIDS fully supports the schools' Health Learning Standards, which emphasize the need to teach health and nutrition but also address the real epidemic of teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDs.

At Metro TeenAIDS, we hear from parents and guardians that although they think they are responsible for teaching their children about the moral and ethical dimensions of relationships and sex, parents also think schools are better equipped to provide the medical facts.

We hear from concerned parents that they want to know what their children are learning in schools. We let parents know that the Web site of the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (osse.dc.gov) has a document explaining the health standards (along with the standards for all subjects).

Health education in the District must include sex education that is science-based and age appropriate. Health research shows that sex education should start with and emphasize abstinence and should include information on condoms and birth control.

Our lack of a consistent health education curriculum clearly has left young people vulnerable. We must demand that schools include information on how young people can protect themselves from one of the top 10 causes of death among D.C. residents: HIV/AIDS.

ADAM TENNER

Executive director

Metro TeenAIDS

Washington

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  5. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  3. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  4. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  3. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  4. The United Socialist States of America
  5. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
More Top Stories »
  1. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  2. Tea Party react: Conservatives seek litmus test for RNC funding
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. LETTER TO EDITOR: When family ties die
  5. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  4. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  5. Tea Party react: Conservatives seek litmus test for RNC funding
More Top Stories »
  1. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
  2. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  3. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  4. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  5. Ego of 'O': It's all about him

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Cowboys' James dimissses Landry

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.