- Mexican truck with radioactive load stolen
- NYPD head Ray Kelly wins big retirement perk — a $1.5M tax-paid team of bodyguards
- #smh: Pentagon may forgive recruits’ vulgar, disrespectful social media posts
- Libraries to feds: Stop spying on us
- Britain eyes new powers to thwart Islamic extremists
- Angry NTSB ousts railroad union from N.Y. train crash site
- Sen. Bernie Sanders hints at White House run
- Westboro Baptists slam actor Paul Walker: He’s ‘in Hell’
- Dick Cheney: Family feud over gay marriage has been ‘dealt with’
- United States ranks 19 of 177 on global corruption survey
Economy delaying 3-D hits
Question of the Day
Looking at the box-office numbers over the past six months, it’s no wonder studio heads and television manufacturers are excited about stereoscopic 3-D technology. It has the power to turn even middling movies into hits.
Yet, despite the enthusiasm, the 3-D revolution has been slowed by economic worries and the cost of converting 2-D screens into 3-D screens at the local cineplex.
Dreamworks Animation studio head Jeffrey Katzenberg told this reporter in December that approximately 2,500 screens would be ready to show his “Monsters vs. Aliens.” Instead, it was shown on just 2,000 or so when it debuted March 27.
Even with that diminished screen count, “Monsters vs. Aliens” rode a 3-D wave to the third-highest March box-office opening ever. It played on 7,300 screens, 2,000 of which — approximately 28 percent — were 3-D. That 28 percent accounted for 56 percent of the box office, about $33 million.
The success of 3-D has been a consistent theme at the box office in recent weeks.
The stop-motion animated feature “Coraline” pulled in an even higher percentage of its first-weekend gross via 3-D screens than did “Monsters vs. Aliens,” almost 75 percent. “My Bloody Valentine 3D” saw 3-D screens outgross standard 2-D screens almost 6-1.
The key to these higher grosses and skewed percentages is the surcharge theaters tack onto any movie playing in 3-D, anywhere from $3 to $5. Is it any wonder the transition to 3-D has the studios salivating?
“They can’t raise their ticket prices 50 cents today,” Mr. Katzenberg, a 3-D evangelist, said of theater owners in December. “Fifty cents people will balk at. They’ll drive to another theater if somebody tries to raise their prices today.
“This, people will pay for.”
So why have exhibitors been so slow to convert their screens to 3-D? The ailing economy is largely to blame.
Even though the studios have promised to pay a portion of the almost $100,000 per-screen conversion cost, theaters have been slow to pick up their end of the cost because of funding complications. As Wall Street tanked, venture capital dried up, taking with it the source of the exhibitors’ conversion money.
Though the conversions are happening at a slower pace than the studios might like, they still are occurring. According to RealD Vice President Rick Heineman, his company hopes to have about 4,000 3-D screens worldwide up and running by the time James Cameron’s “Avatar” hits theaters in December.
“Avatar” could be the game-changer for 3-D at theaters and at home. Mr. Cameron’s first dramatic feature since “Titanic” is sure to be a box-office draw. He also is conferring with television manufacturer Panasonic on how to perfect a version of stereoscopic 3-D that will work in the home.
“We get direct input now right from some of the most amazing creative minds in Hollywood,” says Robert Perry, a senior vice president at Panasonic.
Mr. Cameron has “been really supportive of our efforts and provided us a great deal of feedback and input to kind of keep us on track and make sure we’re sensitized to what their needs are,” he says.
About the Author
- BEYOND HOLLYWOOD: Poking fun at blaxploitation
- MOVIES/BUNCH: A year of hits... and misses (mostly hits)
- 'Avatar' rising
- Blu-ray for everyone
- MOVIE REVIEW: 'Avatar'
Latest Blog Entries
By Tom Harris and Madhav Khandekar
Bad science puts rich nations on the hook for trillions in climate liabilities
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Issa: FBI impeding inquiry into IRS targeting of conservative groups
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- MILLER: Obamas EPA closing smelter will not affect ammunition supply
- Last call: State Dept. bought $180,000 in liquor before shutdown
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- Apple wins facial recognition patent for iPhone 6
- Harry Reid gives some staffers a pass on Obamacare
- Bill Clinton: Damage to Democrats over Obamacare rollout failure will be 'minimal'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Never apologetic. Never afraid. Lieutenant Colonel Allen B. West joins Communities to bring tales from the biggest Foxhole of them all, the one inside the Beltway.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.