- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Compromise climate bill possible
Question of the Day
Moderate House Democrats circulated a watered-down version of a sweeping climate-change-prevention bill Friday as lawmakers moved closer to a compromise on a proposal to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Meanwhile, members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee went “back to the future,” turning to Democratic and Republican leaders of the ‘90s, former Vice President Al Gore and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, to debate the merits of energy measures that will likely dominate the next century.
Rep. Rick Boucher, Virginia Democrat, the de facto leader of the committee’s moderate Democrats, circulated a list of amendments designed to ease regulations outlined in the climate bill pending in committee and met with House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman, California Democrat, to discuss the legislation.
The four-page list, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times, proposed to answer a key question not detailed in the bill drafted by Mr. Waxman and Rep. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat: How much should businesses pay to reduce carbon emissions?
Under the proposal, electric utilities would be given 40 percent of the allowances created through a “cap-and-trade” system that would require companies to hold one allowance for each ton of carbon dioxide they emit.
The changes would also:
• Strip a provision in the bill that would have allowed citizens to sue the government based on harm, or potential harm, from climate change.
• Provide bonus allowances for “early adopters” of clean coal technology.
• Scale back greenhouse gas reduction mandates compared with the Waxman-Markey bill; the alternative would require that carbon dioxide be reduced 6 percent by 2020, 44 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050. The Waxman-Markey bill has a much accelerated timeline.
• Provide free allowances to “energy intensive industries” as outlined in a 2008 bill introduced by Democratic Reps. Mike Doyle of Pennsylvania and Jay Inslee of Washington State.
• Reduce a federal mandate for utilities to use renewable energy sources to 15 percent by 2025 instead of the Waxman-Markey proposal of 25 percent by that date.
A Boucher spokeswoman said she believed the list to be outdated and that no drafts had been made public yet.
House Democratic leaders have said they would like to see a climate bill passed by the Energy and Commerce Committee by Memorial Day, but they have yet to detail how allowances - which could cost businesses and industry tens of billions of dollars a year - would be distributed.
Mr. Waxman deputized Mr. Boucher late in March to round up support for the climate bill among moderate Democrats and party members from coal states.
About the Author
Tom LoBianco has covered energy and environmental policy, including the climate change bill making its way through Congress. From 2007 to 2008, he covered Maryland politics from the Times’s Annapolis bureau. Tom hold’s a master’s degree in political science from Northeastern University and a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park. He spent two and a ...
TWT Video Picks
By Steve King
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq