- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
EDITORIAL: White House cybermistakes
Question of the Day
Monday's resignation of White House cybersecurity adviser Melissa Hathaway was another reminder that President Obama's cyberpolicy is lost in space.
Mr. Obama broadly outlined his cybersecurity plan and creation of a cyberczar May 29 following a policy review led by Ms. Hathaway. The White House has yet to fill the post, likely because the power is limited for any one official to coordinate the disparate federal agencies involved.
Ms. Hathaway, a George W. Bush administration holdover, largely was sidelined by Obama administration officials after arguing that the cyberczar should have direct access to the president. This would ensure power to coordinate federal policy. National Economic Council Director Lawrence H. Summers, National Security Adviser Gen. James L. Jones Jr. and John O. Brennan, Mr. Obama's assistant for homeland security and counterterrorism, fought to protect their turf. The czar will report to both the National Security Agency and NEC.
No one seems to know exactly what the czar will actually oversee. Legislation pending in the Senate would make the Department of Commerce -- an agency with no significant cybersecurity expertise -- the clearinghouse for information the Department of Homeland Security already is supposed to handle. The NSA and many industry interests are quietly fighting this pointless transfer of power between agencies that would add another layer to the federal government's ability to respond.
The federal response is muddled with redundant efforts. Following coordinated attacks on U.S. government and private-sector Web sites over the July 4 weekend, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV asked 11 federal agencies to report on their cybersecurity preparedness. Such issues already had been covered in the White House review. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is asking critical infrastructure industries about their view as part of her Quadrennial Homeland Security Review. These industries already provide an annual update to Homeland Security about threats to their sectors.
Government officials appear more interested in writing new reports and redesigning things from the ground up than actually solving problems. Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel and repeating existing analysis, they need to focus on a coordinated multiagency response.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'