


ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOTOGRAPHS
Republicans have high hopes that Rep. Mark Steven Kirk (left), of Illinois, and Rep. Michael N. Castle, of Delaware, will be able to capture the Senate seats next year that had been held by President Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.President Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. won’t be on the midterm ballot next year, but their former Senate seats will be, and both races are now either tossups or leaning Republican in high-visibility contests.
Mr. Obama, who was a freshman senator from Illinois when he was elected president, and Mr. Biden, who was in his sixth term as a senator from Delaware, come from states that have been running strongly Democratic in past elections. No one doubts that Mr. Obama would have been a re-election shoo-in had he remained in the Senate and that Mr. Biden had his seat for the foreseeable future.
But in another sign of political winds that appear to be blowing against the Democrats in the 2010 cycle, Republicans and independent political analysts say the chances are at least even that their seats could be taken over by two strong Republican candidates next November, when the GOP is expected to make gains in Congress and in the state governorships.
“Not to steal one of President Obama’s favorite words, but in Illinois and Delaware, Republicans have a truly historic opportunity to win both the president and vice president’s Senate seats, and we’re fortunate to have the strongest possible candidates already in the race,” said Brian Walsh, chief spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
TWT RELATED STORIES:
• Senate sends $1.1 trillion pork-laden bill to Obama
• Nelson, Lieberman balk at Medicare buy-in
• Powerful lawmakers clash over $3 billion Army contract
“There is still a long way to go until the election, and we certainly expect polls will fluctuate, but it’s clear that even in traditionally blue states, voters are demanding accountability and want to restore checks and balances in Washington,” Mr. Walsh said.
In Illinois, where Democrats are still reeling from an explosive “pay to play” corruption scandal that led to the arrest and impeachment of Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich, five-term Rep. Mark Steven Kirk, the expected Republican nominee, is running for Mr. Obama’s seat. The Democratic front-runner is state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, whom an opposing Democratic campaign adviser calls a “deeply flawed” candidate.
Illinois Republican leaders have been pounding Democrats for widespread corruption in the state’s government, noting Mr. Giannoulias’ ties to real estate developer and Democratic fundraiser Tony Rezko, who was convicted last year of fraud and money laundering.
“His family bank, where Alexi served as an officer, made loans to Tony Rezko, who is now sitting in a penitentiary,” Republican state chairman Pat Brady said.
But Democratic campaign strategists have been among Mr. Giannoulias’ critics, too.
“Alexi Giannoulias’ own vulnerabilities are so significant, and far more damning than Kirk’s among the electorate. … His nomination would put Barack Obama’s former Senate seat in extreme jeopardy for the Democrats,” pollster Geoff Garin said last month in a widely distributed polling memo for Senate candidate David Hoffman, who is opposing Mr. Giannoulias for the Democratic nomination.
Earlier this year, the White House and state Democratic leaders thought that state Attorney General Lisa Madigan would guarantee that Mr. Obama’s seat would remain in Democratic hands. But after getting the full Oval Office treatment to persuade her to run, she turned down Mr. Obama.
Party strategists say Mr. Giannoulias was their second choice, though White House adviser David Axelrod, who lobbied for Ms. Madigan, isn’t enthusiastic about the turn of events. “She would have walked into the seat,” he told the New York Times last month.
“The Blago saga will hang heavy over our politics,” Mr. Axelrod said.
Sen. Roland W. Burris, who was appointed by Mr. Blagojevich to fill the vacancy, decided not to seek the election after he became the target of a Senate ethics committee investigation arising out of the corruption charges against Mr. Blagojevich. He was cleared of wrongdoing, but the panel said he had provided “incorrect, inconsistent, misleading” information about his conversations with the embattled governor and that his actions were “inappropriate.”
View Entire Story
Americans dissatisfied with major parties are ready to vote Libertarian

By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times
House Republicans accused the White House on Thursday of stonewalling a congressional probe into the ...

By Stephen Braun - Associated Press
Money pouring into the presidential election from super political action committees and nonprofit campaign groups ...

By Kelly Hearn - Special to The Washington Times
Argentina is expected to denounce Great Britain before the United Nations Friday for “introducing nuclear ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Health care reform, organized medicine, physician practice management, and patient care--a real time look at the challenges facing doctors and patients in America today.

Join Matt on weekly adventures in all forms as he pushes past his comfort levels in an attempt to stimulate the body, mind and soul.

A slice of suburban family life from the diverse perspectives of a politically minded mom.