- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Nelson, Lieberman balk at Medicare buy-in
Question of the Day
Two Senate Democratic Caucus members whose votes are key to passing a health care bill said several provisions must be stripped in order to ensure their support, and they said they cannot vote for the bill that currently exists.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has been courting Sens. Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman, but remarks by both men on Sunday’s political-talk programs show that they remain unpersuaded.
Mr. Lieberman, Connecticut independent, said a provision allowing people aged 55 to 64 to buy into Medicare, which was added to the bill to substitute for a “public option” insurance plan, is still a bad deal that adds to the federal budget deficit.
“The opposition to it has been growing as the week has gone on. And though I don’t know exactly what’s in it, from what I hear, I certainly would have a hard time voting for it because it has some of the same infirmities that the public option did,” Mr. Lieberman said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “It will add taxpayer costs. It will add to the deficit. It’s unnecessary.”
When pressed by moderator Bob Schieffer, “So you can’t vote for the bill right now?” Mr. Lieberman answered “yes.”
Mr. Nelson, Nebraska Democrat, also criticized the Medicare proposal as “the forerunner of single-payer, the ultimate single-payer plan, maybe even more directly than the public option,” which would allow a government-supported insurance plan to compete with the private sector.
But at the other end of the Democratic spectrum, many top liberals, most especially House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have said a strong “public option,” not the watered-down substitutes the Senate is trying to pass, is essential to their support.
Mr. Nelson also said he could not support the measure without new safeguards against the public funding of abortions - a measure the Senate already has rejected.
“I can’t support the bill with the abortion language that’s there,” Mr. Nelson declared Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” though he added that lawmakers were trying to assuage his concerns.
“I do know that there are some who are, right now, trying to find language that might be compatible with the Stupak language in the House,” Mr. Nelson said.
Rep. Bart Stupak, Michigan Democrat, successfully sponsored an amendment to the House version of health care reform that barred any public funds going for abortions or insurance plans that cover abortion. Mr. Nelson’s effort to put in similar language was tabled on a 54-45 vote last week.
Democratic leaders have stuck by a stated deadline of Christmas for passage of the sweeping bill, but divisions within the Democratic caucus have made that seem increasingly unlikely.
“There are more Democratic positions than you’d find in a stack of newspapers. And therein lies the problem,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said on “Face the Nation.”
Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat and another key swing vote in the chamber, set another marker for Democrats, saying she will vote against any health bill that does not save money.
“We have to be saving more money for our government than we’re spending. And if we’re not saving more money for our government than we’re spending, then not only will I not support it, the president said he won’t support it,” Mrs. McCaskill said on “Fox News Sunday.”
About the Author
Tom LoBianco has covered energy and environmental policy, including the climate change bill making its way through Congress. From 2007 to 2008, he covered Maryland politics from the Times’s Annapolis bureau. Tom hold’s a master’s degree in political science from Northeastern University and a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park. He spent two and a ...
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq