- Ben Sasse scores Sen. Ted Cruz’s endorsement for Nebraska Senate primary
- Beer-flavored lollipops make debut: ‘An All-American slam-dunk’
- Gabby Giffords’ gun control push gets high-profile speaker: Bill Clinton
- Tony Blair to warn West: Take sides against radical Islam
- Pfc. Bradley Manning’s name change to Chelsea heads to court
- NYPD’s attempt at positive Twitter outreach campaign proves to be an epic fail
- Michigan man among first in U.S. to get ‘bionic eye’
- JetBlue pilots vote to unionize; 2 previous attempts failed
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with ‘full-time’ robots
- Navy’s military dolphins may meet Putin’s porpoises in Black Sea
Salary cap misses one Obama appointee
Weeks before the Treasury Department announced a half-million dollar salary cap for executives at companies taking federal aid, one of President Obama’s top political appointees reported a seven-figure compensation deal with one of the nation’s biggest recipients of bailout cash.
Deputy Secretary of State Jacob Lew filed financial-disclosure papers last month showing he took home just under $1.1 million last year as a managing director at Citi Alternative Investments, a unit of Citigroup. So far, Citigroup has gotten $45 billion in federal bailout funds.
Last week, Treasury announced rules to keep senior executives at some firms that get bailout money from earning more than $500,000. The cap won’t apply to Mr. Lew, however. It isn’t retroactive, and not all executives at companies taking bailout money are affected by the new rules, compensation specialists say.
Mr. Obama promised to rein in big Wall Street paydays, especially at companies taking government bailout money.
“For top executives to award themselves these kinds of compensation packages in the midst of this economic crisis is not only in bad taste — it’s a bad strategy — and I will not tolerate it,” Mr. Obama told reporters last week.
The head of one government-watchdog group said Mr. Lew’s compensation deal, reported in a recent government ethics filing, appears to conflict with the spirit of Mr. Obama’s new pay rules.
“If it’s in bad taste for those on Wall Street, then it’s bad taste for those leaving Wall Street, too,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the nonpartisan Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
The White House did not comment when asked about Mr. Lew’s work for Citigroup. Through State Department spokesman Raphael Cook, Mr. Lew also declined to comment. And a Citigroup spokeswoman said she could not discuss personnel matters.
According to Mr. Lew’s financial disclosure, filed at the U.S. Office of Ethics, he listed $1,099,999.99 in salary and discretionary cash from Citigroup, as well as between $250,001 and $500,000 in unvested, restricted Citigroup stock.
He also reported being eligible for discretionary compensation and that he would receive it prior to becoming deputy secretary of state. A former director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Clinton, Mr. Lew was confirmed by the Senate on Jan. 28.
Had the new pay rules been in place last year, specialists say Citigroup executives likely would have seen their pay cut, according to compensation specialists.
“I think they certainly would have,” said Temple University accounting professor Steven Balsam, a specialist on executive compensation. “They were paying out huge amounts of money … and it backfired. All the while, they were getting bonuses.”
It’s unclear what, if any, role Mr. Lew’s division, Citi Alternative Investments, played in Citigroup’s money troubles. He was chief operating officer and managing director at Citi Alternative, which, according to the company, has about 850 employees and $49.3 billion of capital under management as of Sept. 30. The division specializes in private equity, hedge funds, real estate and other investments.
Raghuram Rajan, an economist at the University of Chicago, said Mr. Lew’s $1.1 million in compensation perhaps would be considered “relatively reasonable in normal times.”
“But as you get into the downturn, we’re seeing questions about whether some of these salaries are reasonable once they’re bailed out by the government,” he said.
About the Author
Jim McElhatton is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Transparency's end: Sen. Richard Blumenthal fights subpoena of own records in union case
- GSA IG helped recover Depression-era masterworks
- HHS nominee Sylvia Burwell entangled in MetLife lawsuit
- HHS nominee got $1.2M at 'zero' salary job at Wal-Mart
- Federal workers watch 'Star Trek' on clock
Latest Blog Entries
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- IRS revokes conservative group's tax-exempt status over anti-Clinton statements: report
- Ministry of Truth: SCOTUS skeptical of law to police campaign 'lies'
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- HURT: President Obama's 'Selfie Doctrine'
- SOWELL: The high cost of liberalism, open spaces and affordable housing
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren: 'I'm not running for president'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.