U.S. to skip racism summit

UNITED NATIONS | The Obama administration is unlikely to attend an upcoming U.N. conference on racism after U.S. diplomats unsuccessfully tried to change language offensive to Israel and other countries, a senior U.S. official said Friday.

The apparent decision removes a source of friction with Israel as Hillary Rodham Clinton prepares for her first official visit next week to the Middle East as secretary of state.

A U.S. delegation spent the past two weeks in Geneva, where it spoke to envoys from 30 nations to try to win concessions on the draft resolution for the U.N. World Conference Against Racism, or “Durban II.”

The Americans rejected the text, saying it should not single out individual nations for censure nor affirm other elements of the document drafted at the first anti-racism summit in Durban, South Africa, in 2001. The official said the Americans also were uneasy with a call for reparations for past slavery.

“As the document is, it cannot be salvaged,” said a State Department official, who was authorized to speak only on the condition that he not be named. “As a result, the United States will not participate in further negotiations on this text, nor will it be able to participate in a conference based on this text.”

Israel has asked the Obama administration to join its boycott of the conference, scheduled for April 20-24 in Geneva. Some Jewish groups have said they were worried that the tone of the meeting would be similar to the 2001 conclave that discussed Zionism as a form of racism.

Mrs. Clinton leaves this weekend for the Middle East, including a stop in Israel, to discuss, among other controversial subjects, Israeli restrictions on aid to Palestinians in Gaza in the aftermath of an Israeli offensive.

“We have no hopes of changes in the essence of the coming Durban conference,” said Israeli Social Affairs Minister Isaac Herzog, who leads his country’s campaign against anti-Semitism.

“We’re waiting on the U.S. to take its stand, since it will inevitably affect European and other countries, and may result in them banning the meeting as well,” he said, speaking before Friday’s news.

So far, only Israel and Canada have announced they will boycott the conference. Some human rights advocates and many U.S. allies would like the U.S. to attend. However, some European countries are skeptical about the value of a meeting that also looks at the history of slavery without shedding light on a practice that still exists.

A European diplomat told The Washington Times that governments also are concerned about adoption of a resolution banning the “defamation of religion.” This is seen in many countries as ensuring respect for Islam, but in Europe and the United States could be seen as an impediment to free speech. The diplomat asked not to be named because he was not authorized to discuss the matter with the press.

The United States and Israel hastily pulled out of the original 2001 conference, arguing that anti-Israel demonstrations made thoughtful dialogue impossible. However, the Obama administration has shown a desire for greater cooperation with U.N. bodies and forums.

In his report to Congress on Tuesday, President Obama pledged “a new era of engagement” with the international community.

“In words and deeds, we are showing the world that a new era of engagement has begun,” Mr. Obama said. “We know that America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America.”

The new president has repeatedly said that the United States and United Nations would have a closer relationship and the clearest examples so far have involved human rights.

Story Continues →