- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
House to vote on fair pay bills
The House will likely vote this week on two pay-discrimination bills that were passed by the last Congress but stopped in the Senate by Republican-led filibusters.
The first measure, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, would overturn a May 2007 Supreme Court decision that made it more difficult for employees to challenge pay discrimination in the workplace. The bill, named after an employee who worked at a Goodyear tire plant in Alabama, would extend the statute of limitations for claims filed by employees regarding pay discrimination.
Noting that women on average earn 78 cents for every dollar paid to men, the second bill, the Paycheck Fairness Act, would require an employer to bear the burden of proving that pay differentials are job related.
The Supreme Court held that Ms. Ledbetter had to file her claim within 180 days of the “unlawful employment practice,” which was Goodyear’s decision to pay her less than it paid men performing similar jobs. Ms. Ledbetter unsuccessfully argued that each paycheck reflecting the discriminatory wage difference represented a new violation of the Equal Pay Act.
The bill the House will consider as early as Wednesday would give a worker 180 days to file a grievance after getting a perceived discriminatory paycheck.
The House passed the Ledbetter bill in 2007, but the Senate could muster only 57 of the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. The bill has a much better chance of passage this year, now that the Democrats have gained as many as eight seats in the Senate.
Business groups strongly oppose any change to the current law’s statute of limitations.
“Statutes of limitations are part of every law in this country for a reason,” said Randel Johnson of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The Paycheck Fairness Act would allow women to sue employers for possible compensatory and punitive damages. Businesses object that these damages would be awarded “even in cases where no intentional discrimination is demonstrated,” said Mr. Johnson, who cited studies by the Government Accountability Office that traced much of the male-female pay differential to seniority, education and other legitimate, nondiscriminatory factors.
The remaining, unexplained pay gap should not be assumed to be based on gender discrimination, he said.
The House passed the Paycheck Fairness Act in July. The bill stalled in the Senate, but Democrats hope to overcome a filibuster with their much larger majority.
The law would expand class-action cases and represents “a giveaway to the trial bar,” Mr. Johnson said.
“Pay discrimination exists, although it’s not rampant,” said Bill Samuel, director of government affairs at the AFL-CIO. “There will not be a rash of lawsuits” if these bills are passed.
“Business hasn’t seen a workplace regulation bill they liked in 75 years,” Mr. Samuel said.
Businesses are “disappointed [Democrats] are ramrodding these bills the way they are,” Mr. Johnson said.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow