EXCLUSIVE: Faith office declares success

Report aims to renew image

By Jon Ward (Contact) | Monday, January 12, 2009

• Print
• [-][+] Font Size
• E-Mail Alerts
• Tell a Friend
• Got a Question?
• You Report
• Click-2-Listen

The White House, in a report to be released Monday morning, will make a final argument that its office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives has been redeemed from its politics-tainted past.

The office, which President Bush created at the beginning of his administration, has been sullied by criticisms from a former agency head and a former staffer, who charged that the White House had used the office for political reasons.

The report, titled "Innovations in Compassion," a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times, argues that the president's effort to direct more federal funding to faith-based local groups across the country has transformed thousands of lives.

It lists some impressive numbers: a 30 percent reduction in homelessness, more than 250,000 drug addicts helped, more than 100,000 children of prisoners matched with mentors, and 535,000 underprivileged students given tutoring, to name a few. The report argues that the president's program is fully or partly responsible for each of these results.

Although the report does not directly address past charges from former deputy director David Kuo, the office has struggled to refocus public attention on its accomplishments since Mr. Kuo went public in 2006 with a book detailing complaints about his time in the White House from 2002 to 2003.

John J. DiIulio Jr., the office's first director, said the faith-based initiative and the Bush White House in general were driven more by politics than by a focus on substantive achievements.

President-elect Barack Obama, essentially citing Mr. Kuo and Mr. DiIulio's criticisms, has said "the office never fulfilled its promise."

The faith-based initiative's acting director, Jedd Medefind, said in an interview that the office's efforts to shed its negative image have been "very disappointing."

The main critiques, he said, "primarily center around the years from 2002 to 2004."

"Almost nothing that's been written or said has anything to do with anything that's happened over the last four yeas. It's almost like writing about the Iraq war pre-surge," he said.

Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?