Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

House OKs stimulus plan without GOP

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat California, speaks during a news conference about the economic stimulus package on Capitol Hill on January 28, 2009 in Washington, DC. Mrs. Pelosi is rallying support for U.S. President Barack Obama's proposed 825 billion dollar economic stimulus package that is scheduled to be voted on in the House. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat California, speaks during a news conference about the economic stimulus package on Capitol Hill on January 28, 2009 in Washington, DC. Mrs. Pelosi is rallying support for U.S. President Barack Obama’s proposed 825 billion dollar economic stimulus package that is scheduled to be voted on in the House. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

The House approved a massive $819 billion stimulus bill Wednesday evening to boost the struggling economy, but not a single Republican voted for the measure despite a personal lobbying pitch from President Obama.

The centerpiece of Mr. Obama’s economic-recovery program cleared its first major hurdle on a 244-188 vote, with 11 Democrats joining all 177 House Republicans in opposition.

Mr. Obama made an unusual trip to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to woo House and Senate Republicans, seeking a bipartisan endorsement of the massive program of new spending and tax cuts. But the united Republican opposition in the House could signal a much more divisive fight than Mr. Obama had bargained for as the Senate continues work on its version of the measure.

Mr. Obama did not mention the lack of Republican support in a statement hailing the House action shortly after the vote concluded.

The president, who earlier in the day met with 13 top business executives who back the stimulus package, said he was “grateful” for the House vote and urged swift action in the Senate.

“What we can’t do is drag our feet or allow the same partisan differences to get in our way,” Mr. Obama said. “We must move swiftly and boldly to put Americans back to work, and that is exactly what this plan begins to do.”

With Democrats holding a nearly 80-seat edge, the ultimate outcome was not in doubt. House Democratic leaders were so confident of the outcome they held a victory press briefing hours before the final vote was taken.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, brushed aside minority complaints that the stimulus bill had been rushed through the chamber with minimal input from Republicans.

“When you lose an argument on policy and substance, what you do is talk about personalities and process,” she said.

Republicans won a few minor skirmishes as the bill worked its way through the House, stripping out money for contraceptive programs under Medicare and for refurbishing the National Mall. But a Republican-sponsored substitute bill tilted heavily toward individual and business tax cuts was shot down on a vote of 266-170.

Republicans complained that the House Rules Committee allowed floor votes on just 11 of nearly 200 amendments proposed by lawmakers of both parties. They said the overall bill was loaded with pork spending projects and would not supply the immediate boost the staggering U.S. economy needed.

The one major amendment approved added another $3 billion to the spending total, boosting from $9 billion to $12 billion the amount of funds targeted for mass-transit programs.

House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey, Wisconsin Democrat, predicted that many of the Republicans who voted against the bill Wednesday would end up supporting the final stimulus package after it is reconciled with the Senate version now taking shape.

“I would hope that, sooner or later, we could cut through this gamesmanship,” Mr. Obey said.

The threat of a filibuster gives Senate Republicans more leverage to amend the stimulus bill, which congressional Democratic leaders hope to pass by mid-February.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Author
David R. Sands

David R. Sands

Raised in Northern Virginia, David R. Sands received an undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He worked as a reporter for several Washington-area business publications before joining The Washington Times.

At The Times, Mr. Sands has covered numerous beats, including international trade, banking, politics ...

You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.

          A President for the People

          T.J. O'Hara has joined the political ring, declaring his candidacy for President. If you agree America is in need of solutions rather than political tactics, his is a message worth reading.