The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • Politics

    Obama-Buffett alliance a family affair

  • National

    High court to examine privacy at work case

  • Politics

    House bill extends EPA reach into wetlands

  • Politics

    U.S. nears sanctions for Iranian nukes

  • Politics

    Lawmakers' fine dining on taxpayers' tab

  • National

    Colo. court upholds tax privacy for illegals

  • Business

    U.S. red ink flirts with crisis, panel warns

Home » News » World

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Clinton urged Obama to talk tough on Iran

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Shift was a 'surprise'

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had urged President Obama early on to take a hard line on Iran's crackdown on postelection protesters, and it came as "a happy surprise," according to an administration official, when the president publicly condemned Tehran's harsh treatment of demonstrators.

More World Stories

  • Pandas' bamboo love may be in their genes
  • U.S. nears sanctions for Iranian nukes
  • Medical aid to Cuba hits snags
  • Hamas rally ignites backers

By Nicholas Kralev

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton urged President Obama for two days to toughen his language on Iran before he did so, and then was surprised when he condemned Iran's crackdown on demonstrators last week, administration officials say.

At his June 23 news conference, Mr. Obama said he was "appalled and outraged" by Iranian behavior and "strongly condemned" the violence against anti-government demonstrators. Up until then, Mr. Obama and other administration officials had taken a softer line, expressing "deep concern" about the situation and calling on Iran to "respect the dignity of its own people."

Behind the scenes, the officials, who spoke on the condition that they not be named because they were discussing internal deliberations, said Mrs. Clinton had been advocating the stronger U.S. response, but the president resisted. When he finally took her advice, the aides said, he did so without informing her first.

This was the first known example of awkwardness between the two former rivals for the Democratic nomination for president since they made up following Mr. Obama's election. The disagreement also gave some insight into the Obama administration's foreign policy decision-making process five months into its term.

The officials said they were familiar with the language Mr. Obama used in his news conference because it was sent to the State Department a day earlier, but that Mrs. Clinton did not know until he uttered the words that he would choose that moment to make them public.

OTHER TWT STORIES:
• Rep. Kaptur gets $3.5 billion sweetener in climate bill
• GOP: EPA hid global warming memo
• Sanford says he 'crossed lines' with additional women
• Conyers supported project linked to wife
• Obama lauds troop withdraw

"It was a happy surprise," one administration official said. "It was echoing the line the secretary had been pushing for a couple of days."

Another official said Mr. Obama apparently did not make the final decision to go ahead with the tougher stance until shortly before his remarks.

"I don't think he himself had decided to do it until he did it, but we knew full well it was headed that way, because the White House sent over the actual language he'd use if he chose to take that line for folks to review and weigh in on, which State did," the second official said.

The White House and the State Department declined to comment publicly on Mrs. Clinton's "private advice" to Mr. Obama and their internal communications.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Polls show Dems might lose Obama, Biden Senate seats
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's risky-sex czar
  3. New underground economy
  4. EDITORIAL: Black Panther battle intensifies
  5. Researcher: NASA hiding climate data
More Top Stories »
  1. Rising costs predicted in health care bill
  2. EDITORIAL: A Black Panther sings
  3. D.C. deputy fire chief also works in Florida
  4. Muslim leaders vow cyber response to luring youths
  5. A gun case or Pandora's box?

Most Shared

  1. Polls show Dems might lose Obama, Biden Senate seats
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's risky-sex czar
  3. EDITORIAL: Black Panther battle intensifies
  4. D.C. deputy fire chief also works in Florida
  5. Powerful lawmakers clash over $3B Army contract
More Top Stories »
  1. Senate sends $1.1T pork-laden bill to Obama
  2. WILLIAMS: Absurdity of athlete worship
  3. Let him take another bow
  4. EDITORIAL: Socialism by any other name...
  5. New underground economy

Most Commented

  1. Polls show Dems might lose Obama, Biden Senate seats
  2. Senate sends $1.1T pork-laden bill to Obama
  3. Disney's latest breaks barriers, to viewers' delight
  4. EDITORIAL: Black Panther battle intensifies
  5. D.C. deputy fire chief also works in Florida
More Top Stories »
  1. Left rankled over Obama war remarks
  2. Poor nations agree to resume climate talks
  3. A convenient lie
  4. Obama: Time for banks to increase lending
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama's risky-sex czar

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Should President Obama sign the $1.1 trillion spending bill?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    Coal company cuts 500 jobs, blames environmentalists

  • Belief Blog

    Glasspool election: What comes next

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Fox back in the league

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.