Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Driver’s license photo? Just curb your enthusiasm

You really are allowed to smile for your driver’s license photo.

A little.

Like Mona Lisa, with an ever-so-slight upward curl on both corners of the lips.

Just don’t bare your teeth.

Drivers in some other states are getting a similar message as a growing number of motor vehicle bureaus implement facial-recognition software to combat license fraud and identity theft.

The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators says 31 states are using facial-recognition technology.

Virginia hopes to join them in the near future, DMV spokeswoman Melanie Stokes said. In anticipation of adding the facial-recognition technology, the agency is asking Virginians to strike a “neutral expression” when they are photographed for driver’s licenses loaded with new security features.

The technology compares facial features to get a match and can be used to compare license photos over time. Miss Stokes said it works best when a similar expression is maintained from photo to photo.

Indiana, which began using facial recognition in November, uses the same rationale to stifle excessive smiling. Dennis Rosebrough, spokesman for the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, said a few people have complained about the smile restriction, but they accept it more quickly once they’re told it’s a security measure, not a “bureaucrat’s whim.”

Authorities said Indiana’s system has led to the arrest of a convicted forger as he tried to establish a sixth fake identity just months after his parole.

In Nevada, the technology helped authorities nab a welfare cheat and a sex offender, DMV spokesman Kevin R. Malone said.

Virginia’s DMV began requiring the neutral expression in March. The policy has been widely interpreted as a smile ban, but Miss Stokes said that’s not quite accurate.

“You can have a grin with your mouth closed,” she said. “The main thing is, just don’t open your mouth.”

It’s not clear how many states are restricting smiles because some systems are more sensitive to variations in expression than others, said Jason King, a spokesman for the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators.

Nevada is a little more flexible than some, allowing a glimpse of pearly whites - but no ear-to-ear beaming.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    ‘Personhood’ bill advances in Va. House

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • Despite city’s growth, D.C. school enrollment falls

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Recall effort against D.C. mayor, council chairman begins

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Virginia House clerk G. Paul Nardo (left) listens Monday to Delegate Jennifer L. McClellan (second from right) as she speaks with House Speaker William J. Howell (third from right) at the Capitol in Richmond. The Republican party has enjoyed a banner first half of the General Assembly session, pushing through far-reaching legislation. (Associated Press)

    With assembly control, GOP pushing through its agenda

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • George W. Huguely V arrives Feb. 8, 2012, at court in Charlottesville for the start of his trial. Mr. Huguely is charged with the murder of fellow University of Virginia senior Yeardley Love. (Associated Press)

    Huguely jurors see photos of Love’s injuries

    By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now