The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • National

    Tiger Woods seriously injured in car accident

  • Security

    White House praises IAEA's censures of Iran

  • Business

    Wall Street tumbles on Dubai fears

  • Local

    Private funeral Friday for Pollin

  • Politics

    Ads add heat to health care debate

  • National

    At Mall of America, it's business as usual

  • World

    Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia

Home » News » National

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Chances slim for cameras in Supreme Court

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor's likely confirmation may reopen debate on allowing television cameras to broadcast court proceedings. (Associated Press)

More National Stories

  • Tiger Woods seriously injured in car accident
  • Black Friday shoppers pack stores
  • Space shuttle Atlantis returns to Earth
  • 4 shot dead at Thanksgiving party

By Tom LoBianco

Justice David H. Souter once famously vowed that the only way a television camera would gain access to the marble halls of the Supreme Court would be to "roll over my dead body," but even with his impending retirement, it's hard to tell whether high-court arguments will be broadcast anytime soon.

Justice Souter drew his anti-television line in the sand before a congressional panel in 1996, putting a stake through efforts by C-SPAN and others to televise hearings.

With his retirement, the spotlight moves to Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who was nominated by President Obama to fill Justice Souter's seat. Her likely confirmation opens a slim chance for advocates at least to rehash the arguments against cameras in the high court.

"At least you don't have someone willing to give his life to keep cameras out of the courtroom," said C-SPAN President Brian Lamb only half-jokingly.

Mr. Lamb said it's hard to tell how a Justice Sotomayor would stand on the issue, though she has been televised during court hearings as a member of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Public declarations by the nine justices on the nation's highest court have ranged from tepid support for the idea to Souteresque over-my-dead-body declarations. No justice appears to be passionately in favor of entering the modern media age gracefully.

Lawmakers, including some who have tried forcing the nation's high court to allow cameras inside, frequently turn to confirmation hearings to poll court nominees on their stance.

"Why shouldn't the Supreme Court be open to the public with television?" Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican at the time, asked Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. during Justice Alito's 2006 confirmation hearings.

Justice Alito, the most recent addition to the nine-judge court, was circumspect in his answer, saying that he had joined colleagues on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals to allow the televising of oral arguments. He declined to say whether the Supreme Court should follow suit.

Judge Sotomayor, to judge from the public record, has not weighed in on the question of televising Supreme Court hearings. New members, such as Justice Alito, tend to defer to the more experienced justices.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
More Top Stories »
  1. D.C. sports icon, Wizards owner Pollin dies
  2. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  3. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  4. List of W.H. state dinner guests
  5. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  2. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  3. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  4. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  5. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
More Top Stories »
  1. Finance mavens gloomy
  2. Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race
  3. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  4. Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia
  5. Global Warmists exposed

Most Commented

  1. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  5. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
More Top Stories »
  1. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  2. Obama taking emissions goal to summit
  3. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure
  4. 9/11 families sharply split on civilian court trials
  5. Crashers probe may become criminal investigation

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Are you planning to go shopping today?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Hall out, Rogers will start

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.