The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

  • Business

    Parents buying homes for kids at college

  • Politics

    Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

  • National

    Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate

Home » News » National

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Chances slim for cameras in Supreme Court

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor's likely confirmation may reopen debate on allowing television cameras to broadcast court proceedings. (Associated Press)

More National Stories

  • With its 'Mother' dead, future of doomsday sect is in doubt
  • Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'
  • Nation Briefs
  • 19-year-old led L.A. celebrity burglaries

By Tom LoBianco

Justice David H. Souter once famously vowed that the only way a television camera would gain access to the marble halls of the Supreme Court would be to "roll over my dead body," but even with his impending retirement, it's hard to tell whether high-court arguments will be broadcast anytime soon.

Justice Souter drew his anti-television line in the sand before a congressional panel in 1996, putting a stake through efforts by C-SPAN and others to televise hearings.

With his retirement, the spotlight moves to Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who was nominated by President Obama to fill Justice Souter's seat. Her likely confirmation opens a slim chance for advocates at least to rehash the arguments against cameras in the high court.

"At least you don't have someone willing to give his life to keep cameras out of the courtroom," said C-SPAN President Brian Lamb only half-jokingly.

Mr. Lamb said it's hard to tell how a Justice Sotomayor would stand on the issue, though she has been televised during court hearings as a member of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Public declarations by the nine justices on the nation's highest court have ranged from tepid support for the idea to Souteresque over-my-dead-body declarations. No justice appears to be passionately in favor of entering the modern media age gracefully.

Lawmakers, including some who have tried forcing the nation's high court to allow cameras inside, frequently turn to confirmation hearings to poll court nominees on their stance.

"Why shouldn't the Supreme Court be open to the public with television?" Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican at the time, asked Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. during Justice Alito's 2006 confirmation hearings.

Justice Alito, the most recent addition to the nine-judge court, was circumspect in his answer, saying that he had joined colleagues on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals to allow the televising of oral arguments. He declined to say whether the Supreme Court should follow suit.

Judge Sotomayor, to judge from the public record, has not weighed in on the question of televising Supreme Court hearings. New members, such as Justice Alito, tend to defer to the more experienced justices.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. Parents buying homes for kids at college
More Top Stories »
  1. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
  2. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  5. House OKs health reform bill

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: The negative Obama factor
  2. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  3. Obama's unlearned lesson
  4. EDITORIAL: The grass roots keep growing
  5. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  3. Furious scramble for health reform support
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  2. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Making fun of faith

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Do you think the health reform bill will pass?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Mitchell, Henson are active

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.