Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Gay Democrats close wallets to Obama

getty images for feeding america
PRESSURE: President Obama faces questions about the next steps he'll take to expand gay rights.getty images for feeding america PRESSURE: President Obama faces questions about the next steps he’ll take to expand gay rights.

Gay Democrats are using their wallets to pressure President Obama, while liberal groups are asking him to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” as a national security issue.

Several top donors have boycotted Democratic National Committee fundraisers and promised the party would feel the financial pain.

Despite pressure from Democrats and liberal groups, the administration has swatted down calls for Mr. Obama to exert executive authority and halt discharges happening at a rapid clip under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” ban on gays serving openly in the military.

The fundraising pressure started with frustration over the Obama administration’s Justice Department defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in a legal brief.

Mr. Obama has said he wants to repeal the act. But the language in the brief — comparing same-sex marriage to incest, for example — has been labeled by many as indefensible and offensive, and wealthy gay activists are warning they will keep withholding money.

“Unfortunately, I will see everything that the Obama administration does for LGBT Americans through the lens of the DOMA brief,” Stampp Corbin, a San Diego city commissioner and former co-chairman of the Obama campaign’s LGBT Leadership Council, wrote on his blog. “Mr. President, … [y]ou better get LGBT affirming legislation moving quickly or the coffers of the LGBT community will be slammed shut on the fingers of your administration and the DNC.”

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said he was not aware of internal discussions involving the language in the Justice Department brief and that he did not know whether the language was cleared by Mr. Obama, but he has said the Justice Department is required to argue in favor of government laws.

A Capitol Hill arts shop this weekend will have live music and food to urge gays and lesbians to “redirect their dollars” from Thursday’s DNC fundraiser to a gay-friendly film festival Reel Affirmations. Donors will send a “regrets card” to the DNC to alert the party to the frustration.

As the gay rights efforts increase in size and scope, the White House seems to be responding. Mr. Obama will speak to gays and lesbians Monday and face questions about the next steps he’s promised following the extension of some benefits to gay federal workers.

Among those steps may be including gay couples in the 2010 census, but members of Congress and activists want Mr. Obama to go further with either an executive order on the military ban or telling the Pentagon to stop investigating reports of gay service members.

Lawrence Korb of the Center for American Progress said it’s unacceptable that 265 people have been discharged under the ban since Mr. Obama took office in January. “Readiness is going to suffer and people’s lives could get lost,” he said.

Recently, 77 members of Congress — 76 Democrats and one Florida Republican — wrote to Mr. Obama, saying they “stand ready” to assist him with the repeal, calling the 1990s-era law “misguided, unjust and flat-out discriminatory.”

They said national security “will continue to suffer” if the president waits until 2010 or 2011 to take action and asked that he direct the Pentagon not to investigate any outings of gay service members.

Mr. Gibbs repeatedly said Thursday that Mr. Obama believes “the only and best way to do this is through a durable comprehensive legislative process,” meaning the duty falls to Congress. Already, 149 lawmakers already have co-sponsored a bill to end the ban on gay troops.

The White House won’t say when the repeal might become reality, but aides say the president remains committed to repealing the military ban and DOMA and would sign bills repealing each.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Author

Christina Bellantoni

Christina Bellantoni is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times in Washington, D.C., a post she took after covering the 2008 Democratic presidential campaigns. She has been with The Times since 2003, covering state and Congressional politics before moving to national political beat for the 2008 campaign. Bellantoni, a San Jose native, graduated from UC Berkeley with ...
You Might Also Like
  • Rep. Ron Paul

    Republicans see need to give Paul a voice

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

          From Naïve to Native in Madrid

          Join along as a George Washington University student immerses himself into Madrid’s food, arts, cultural and social life as he quests for total Spanish enculturation.

          LifeCycles

          The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.

          Stimulus That!

          Global economy, the civilizing power of markets and public morals.