- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
Treasury urged no tax on bonuses
Question of the Day
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner on Thursday admitted that his staff encouraged lawmakers to take out a key provision in last month’s stimulus that would have taxed executive compensation in an attempt to discourage companies such as AIG from handing out excessive bonuses while receiving billions of taxpayer dollars.
“What we did is just express concern about the vulnerability of a specific part of this provision,” Mr. Geithner said during an interview on CNN, confirming that his staff said retroactive penalties would spark lawsuits.
Mr. Geithner continued to say that he did not know about AIG’s planned $165 million in bonuses for top employees until March 10, but left room for the possibility that he had some inkling about the bonuses prior to that.
“On Tuesday I was informed about the full scale and scope of these specific bonus problems,” he said.
The Treasury Department and the White House did not answer queries about whether Mr. Geithner’s comment meant he had known anything at all about the bonuses before March 10. The embattled 47-year-old Treasury secretary added that he took “full responsibility” for not catching the bonuses earlier and stopping them from going through, one day after Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, said his staff had removed language from the stimulus mandating retroactive penalties on big bonuses.
But he and his department faced questions from Republicans why they did not renegotiate the bonuses earlier this month when they gave AIG an additional $30 billion in taxpayer bailout funds, bringing the total given to AIG since last fall to more than $170 billion.
Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, said Mr. Geithner and his staff knew about the bonuses before they rolled out the additional $30 billion in aid on March 2.
“The Federal Reserve Bank of New York says they notified Treasury in February,” Mr. Cornyn said, referring to the insitution that Mr. Geithner headed until Mr. Obama named him to the Treasury Department in December.
The New York Fed refused to comment on the accusation that it told the Treasury about the bonuses on Feb. 28, as has been reported by Time magazine.
“What’s clear is that the administration should have known about these bailout bonuses a lot earlier. And they should have taken action before they sent AIG another $30 billion earlier this month,” Mr. Cornyn said on the Senate floor.
Don Stewart, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said that the $30 billion infusion was a perfect opportunity to force concessions from AIG in the same way that the administration has negotiated with the United Auto Workers.
“They had 30 billion reasons to renegotiate. That’s a whole lot of leverage,” Mr. Stewart said.
Mr. Stewart also pointed out that Mr. Dodd’s amendment to the stimulus, as it was passed by the Congress, still included language authorizing the treasury secretary to renegotiate executive compensation if he judged it to be “excessive, inconsistent with the purposes of [the stimulus or the Troubled Asset Relief Program], or otherwise contrary to the public interest.”
The Treasury Department ducked questions about why the bonuses were not renegotiated under this clause during the agreement to give AIG an additional $30 billion.
About the Author
- GOP sees little outreach in health care debate
- Obama nears decision on Afghan strategy
- Obama: 'No faith justifies' Fort Hood attack
- Obama: No religious faith justifies Fort Hood shootings
- Democrats torn on Afghanistan, women's rights
Latest Blog Entries
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- BERMAN & MADYOON: An Iranian-Turkish reset
- MAY: Barbarians at Jordan's gate
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare in intensive care
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq