Democrats brushed aside questions about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but as hearings begin Wednesday it was clear that questions about who knew and approved of enhanced interrogation techniques have expanded beyond the Bush administration to include Mrs. Pelosi and others in Congress.
The No. 2 House Democrat on Tuesday said revelations that Mrs. Pelosi knew about waterboarding terrorism suspects as early as 2003 - contrary to several previous statements - have not undermined the California Democrat’s credibility within the caucus.
Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, insisted Mrs. Pelosi’s evolving story has not caused her to lose support of fellow Democrats. “I think the Republicans are simply trying to distract the American public with who knew what, when.”
A Director of National Intelligence (DNI) report released last week that described congressional briefings about enhanced interrogation techniques showed Mrs. Pelosi was briefed in September 2002 about so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, or EITs, which included waterboarding.
Waterboarding, a tactic that simulates drowning and denounced by President Obama as torture, has become a centerpiece for criticizing the purported excesses of the Bush administration’s war on terrorism.
Mrs. Pelosi, who recently said she was never told that waterboarding would be used on terrorism suspects, responded by questioning the accuracy of the intelligence memo.
House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn echoed Mr. Hoyer.
“These political attacks on the speaker come from a party in disarray,” the South Carolina Democrat said. “Republicans are simply distracting from the substance of the debate.”
But rank-and-file Democrats remained mostly mum.
Questions about Mrs. Pelosi’s predicament that The Washington Times posed in phone calls and e-mails to nearly two dozen House Democrats - members ranging from staunch antiwar lawmakers to the party’s hawks - yielded few responses aside from “no comment.”
“I don’t think people are running away from this issue,” Hoyer spokeswoman Stephanie Lundberg said. “This almost incessant focus on what the speaker knew is a distraction.”
Scrutiny has increasingly honed in on Mrs. Pelosi as Democrats prepared to start investigating who in the Bush administration signed off on harsh methods used by the CIA to extract information from detainees in the war on terrorism.
Republicans, who have struggled to gain momentum since Democrats assumed complete control of Washington in January, eagerly latched on to the issue.
Rep. Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, requested Monday that the CIA declassify and publicly release records fully detailing congressional briefings on interrogation techniques.
“The American people should be given the full picture on what was known and agreed to on Capitol Hill on a bipartisan basis about the enhanced interrogation program,” Mr. Hoekstra said.View Entire Story
Steven A Miller
Kara Rowland, White House reporter for The Washington Times, is a D.C.-area native. She graduated from the University of Virginia, where she studied American government and spent nearly all her waking hours working as managing editor of the Cavalier Daily, UVa.’s student newspaper.
Her interest in political reporting was piqued by an internship at Roll Call the summer before her ...
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
A mother of three and a passionate conservative, Shirley Husar changes the game.
This column will cover anything that has anything remotely to do with the game of baseball, from the game itself to mid-summer trades to offseason moves.
Eye on Europe, the Middle East and Africa
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention