Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

The Senate has a chance this week to kill the most offensive nomination of an executive-branch official since President Clinton’s ill-fated selection of radical black racialist Lani Guinier for assistant attorney general in 1993. Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh is unfit to be chief legal counsel at the State Department. Senators should vote him down.

Mr. Koh’s repeatedly stated agenda is contrary to the American tradition of law originating in the “consent of the governed.” In its place, Mr. Koh would apply what he calls a “transnationalist” approach whereby domestic laws and even the Constitution could be brushed aside in favor of international authorities.

From various writings by Mr. Koh, we learn that American courts should “moderate” certain of our rights that create “conflicts,” such as “our exceptional free-speech tradition.” He also has encouraged outside criticism of Americans’ “embrace of the First Amendment.”

The Second Amendment fares no better. In an essay called “A World Drowning in Guns,” Mr. Koh endorsed a “global regulatory” regime to outlaw firearms though “rules negotiated among governments at a horizontal, intergovernmental level and interpreted through the interaction of transnational actors.” Those laws, he wrote, could then be “internalized into the domestic statutes, executive practice and judicial systems of those participating nations.”

What he means is that international gun bans could be imposed on American citizens without a vote of the American people. Likewise, the Eighth Amendment could be newly read to bar the death penalty despite the Constitution’s explicit acceptance of it elsewhere in the document, merely because American judges suddenly decide to “pay decent respect to the opinions of mankind.”

Lest anybody think we misread Mr. Koh’s intentions, here is his own explanation from a 2006 essay on so-called transnationalism: “The transnationalists view domestic courts as having a critical role to play in domesticating international law into U.S. law, while nationalists argue that only the political branches can internalize international law.”

By superseding the lawmaking role of the “political branches,” Mr. Koh would give unelected judges the right to create laws based on the views of Danes, Brazilians and Zimbabweans without regard to the votes of the American people. The Senate, which rightly sees itself as the duly elected voice of the people of each individual state, would thus see its own power - and that of the citizens it represents - eroded and undermined by an astonishing degree.

No matter how you spin it, transnationalism is an assault on the underpinnings of the U.S. Constitution, which by terms ratified by this nation’s people is the “supreme Law of the Land.” To take office, Mr. Koh would be asked to take an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States … [and to] bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” No man who advocates transationalism can take that oath in good conscience.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts