The Washington Times

BURMAN: Different way to pay for health reform

A 10 percent VAT would pay for the voucher and tax credit. Over time, the VAT could be expanded to cover the costs of other federal health programs, making real income-tax reform, including significantly lower rates, a possibility.

A VAT earmarked for health care would help slow health-care costs because, if health spending continues to grow unabated, the VAT rate will go up and up, building pressure on politicians and health-care providers to restrain costs. This dynamic contrasts with the current system, in which many people think that health insurance is almost free, paid for by employers or the government.

A new tax might sound like a political fantasy, but an outspoken advocate of this approach has been Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and an adviser to the president on health care.

The worst thing we could do would be to create another expensive health-care entitlement without figuring out how to pay for it. That would be hazardous to our children’s health.

• Len Burman is director of the Tax Policy Center and an institute fellow at the Urban Institute.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

      Independent voices from the TWT Communities

      Life Lines: Where Readers Write

      Join the Communities and submit your column in response to one written, or on something totally new and unique. We want to hear from you

      Medicine and Politics in America

      Health care reform, organized medicine, physician practice management, and patient care--a real time look at the challenges facing doctors and patients in America today.