

Barney FrankThe House passed a bill Wednesday to move up tough new rules for credit card lenders, lashing out at an industry that has been raising interest rates and fees at a furious pace since the rules were passed in May.
But the proposed new deadline faces a tough challenge in the Senate, where lawmakers worry that it would place an unreasonable burden on lenders.
Congress’ sweeping credit card reform legislation significantly limited the industry’s powers by curbing the ability of lenders to increase credit card interest rates and impose fees and penalties on consumers.
Some lenders have been pushing through big rate increases ahead of the new laws - many of which take effect Feb. 22 - infuriating lawmakers who accused the companies of abusing their nine-month grace period.
“It is the single unfairest economic transaction I can think of that doesn’t involve a pistol,” said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, Massachusetts Democrat, who helped draft the measure. “This is hostage taking. This is raising money after the fact.”
The House passed by a vote of 331-92 a bill by Mr. Frank to move up the effective date of the rules to Dec. 1. Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin of South Dakota was the lone Democrat to vote against the measure, while 83 Republicans supported it.
The law generally bars lenders from increasing interest rates on existing credit card balances unless a customer is more than 60 days behind on a payment. The measure requires lenders to give consumers 45 days notice when they increase rates.
Banks also will be prohibited from issuing cards to people younger than 21 unless a parent co-signs the application or the cardholder can prove he has the means to pay back the loan.
Many House lawmakers wanted a shorter deadline when the bill initially passed the House in May. But Democrats who drafted the rules gave banks nine months to prepare for the changes to assuage concerns in the Senate that the restrictions were too severe.
Moving up the deadline will be tough sell in the Senate, where banking committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, has said he doesn’t want to tinker with the original timeline.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke also has warned that moving up the date of the laws could hurt consumers by leading to “unintended consequences.”
Rep. Spencer Bachus, the top Republican on the House Financial Services Committee, has argued that the effective date of the law shouldn’t be changed, saying Congress should abide by Mr. Bernanke’s view.
The Alabama lawmaker added that the new law is flawed and has already caused financial pain for small businesses that rely on credit cards as a key source of financing.
“The new credit card restrictions are exacerbating the economic crisis and the loss of jobs,” Mr. Bachus said. “This original bill came at just the wrong time.”
Credit card companies complain that moving up the effective date is unfair because they need more time to implement the changes.
View Entire StorySean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at slengell@washingtontimes.com.
By H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times
Nicholas Rastenis has been through the wringer.

By Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich hinted Sunday that if rival Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney ...

By Manuel Valdes - Associated Press
Three skiers were killed Sunday when an avalanche swept them about a quarter-mile down an ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Charm City Charmers: a not-so-ragtag group of Baltimore area writers lead by Tamar Alexia Fleishman

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.