The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • National

    PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine

  • National

    U.S. links 8 to Somali terrorist group

  • Business

    Home sales surge 10.1 percent in October

  • Local

    Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll

  • Politics

    S.C. governor faces 37 ethics violations

  • National

    China holds lawyer who tried to see Obama

  • World

    Israel-Hamas prisoner swap talks advance

Home » News » Security

Friday, October 2, 2009

Obama meets with McChrystal in Denmark

Rate this story

Average 5.00
after 4 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Surprise meeting one day after general speaks out

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • President Barack Obama is escorted by Colonel Steven Shepro, Commander of the 316th Wing upon his arrival at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on Thursday Oct. 1, 2009, en route to Copenhagen to help in Chicago's bid effort for the 2016 Summer Olympics. The IOC will choose the winning city in a vote tomorrow. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

More Security Stories

  • Smugglers set eyes on U.S. truck program
  • Bombings, shooting kill 12 around Afghanistan
  • Fort Hood victim buried at Arlington
  • Obama's war strategy expected next week

By Jon Ward

UPDATED:

President Obama unexpectedly Friday met in Copenhagen with Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, one day after the general spoke out publicly on his need for more troops.

The president and the general met on board Air Force One for about 25 minutes at the end of Mr. Obama's roughly five-hour visit to Copenhagen, where he made the case earlier Friday to the International Olympic Committee for why Chicago should host the 2016 Summer Olympics.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One that Gen. McChrystal flew from London to Copenhagen specifically to meet with Mr. Obama.

"The president wanted to take the opportunity to get together with Gen. McChrystal," Mr. Gibbs said.

The meeting took place before Air Force One took off, and Gen. McChrystal did not come with Mr. Obama back to Washington. In an e-mail sent from Air Force One as the president flew home, Mr. Gibbs clarified who requested the meeting.

The president "wanted to talk, and they agreed today would work," Mr. Gibbs wrote.

Gen. McChrystal was in London on Thursday to deliver a speech to an audience of military specialists.

As Mr. Obama and his national security team continue an in-depth review of their options and strategies in Afghanistan, Gen. McChrystal voiced his position clearly and forcefully in London on whether or not the U.S. should increase its commitment of soldiers in Afghanistan from the current 68,000.

The general was asked if he supported reducing the American footprint in favor of a more lightweight effort to go after specific targets, and said, "The short answer is: No."

"You have to navigate from where you are, not from where you wish to be," he said. "A strategy that does not leave Afghanistan in a stable position is probably a short-sighted strategy."

In Washington Thursday, Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command, said he had "not yet endorsed" any troop increase.

"That is something I can assure has not leaked and is exceedingly closely held although that is about to be introduced into the equation," he said at The Atlantic's "First Draft of History" conference. "Because obviously at a certain point, once you have talked about goals and objectives and then discussed various options for achieving those goals and objectives, you've got to put a price tag on it, and that price tag eventually of course will have numbers of troops, possibly, associated with it, will have numbers of dollars associated with it, will have numbers of civilians associated."

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  2. Not invited: Republican lawmakers
  3. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
More Top Stories »
  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

Most Shared

  1. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  4. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  5. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  2. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  3. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  4. VMI faces probe into sexism
  5. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  3. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  4. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  5. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  2. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
  3. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Do you think the public option will survive when the full Senate votes on the health reform bill?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Mason returns

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.