- GOP presses to scrap IRS commissioner position — but put in panel
- New bill would make sure women in military can get free birth control
- Trafficking bust reveals worries over missing kids; minors as young as 11 found
- Catholic League slams Obama: ‘Do Christian lives mean so little to you?’
- National laboratory cancels ‘Southern Accent Reduction’ classes after outcry
- U.S. woman with Ebola is stable, improving, son says
- Belgium pushes for clear labeling of goods from Israeli settlements
- ‘Queen of Mean’ Leona Helmsley’s former home hits market for $65M
- Florida beach-goers told to beware flesh-eating bacteria in water
- Lundergan Grimes uses ‘war on women’ strategy to attack McConnell
DAVIS: Challenging liberals’ moral consistency
Question of the Day
“We dropped countless fliers over their homes, sent thousands of text messages and called thousands of cell phones asking people to leave. Never has a country gone to such extraordinary lengths to remove the enemy’s civilian population from harm’s way.”
It’s one thing for a U.N. entity calling itself a “Human Rights Council” to include governments that are notorious serial human rights violators. That hypocrisy has been long noted and ridiculed by fair-thinking people around the world. But it is quite another when people who call themselves “liberals” or “progressives” on the left side of the ideological spectrum are complicit in similar hypocrisy.
Recent polling data in the U.S. since Israel’s Gaza intervention has shown increased negative attitudes toward Israel by liberal Democrats (and, conversely, increased support by Republican conservatives), although the data show substantially greater support from all Americans, including liberals and Democrats, for the Israeli positions versus the Palestinian positions.
Why are people who call themselves liberals less supportive of Israel than self-described conservatives? I don’t get it. I consider myself a proud liberal on all major issues and have supported an independent Palestinian state since I was a kid - consistent, of course, with Israel’s security. Israel is a parliamentary democracy, with transparent courts and a vigorous free press, granting its women, minorities and gays equal rights and the same civil rights for all its Arab citizens as are enjoyed by Israeli citizens. Not one Arab country surrounding Israel can make that claim.
So why wouldn’t liberals support Israel as much as conservatives, if not more so? So why the apparent double standard on the left, not just on Israel, but when it comes to Iran, too?
For example, there were plenty of demonstrations by the left in America and in Western Europe when Israel intervened in Gaza - but none when, during the previous eight years, Hamas aimed its terrorist rockets, intentionally killing Israeli civilians. Why?
Then Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza in 2005, dismantling 21 settlements and uprooting more than 8,000 Israelis. And the response from Hamas: to send another 6,000 rockets intentionally aimed at killing Israeli civilians. Where was the U.N. and its so-called Human Rights Council? Where was the left demonstrating for human rights in Europe and the U.S.?
There was … well … silence from most of the left. Why?
Liberals have always taken the lead against nuclear proliferation. Yet as Iran develops a nuclear weapon, threatening a dangerous cycle of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East among Sunni Arab states, why isn’t the liberal leadership in the U.S. and abroad - the legatees of the “ban the bomb” and “nuclear freeze” movements - leading the call for draconian economic sanctions against Iran until it halts its nuclear-weapons program, including a world ban on exporting to Iran the refined oil products on which it heavily depends?
Historically, liberalism stands, above all, for the core values of civil liberties, due process, and peaceful negotiations and diplomacy - and uncompromising opposition to the immoral acts of terrorists, whether al Qaeda, Hezbollah or Hamas, who justify the intentional killing of innocent civilians for some political or theological purpose.
No exceptions. Thus, liberals should overwhelmingly demand that the Palestinians accept Israel’s minimal request to bring peace. In Mr. Netanyahu’s words: “We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say ‘yes’ to a Jewish state.”
And we liberals must invest just as much energy and grass-roots commitment to supporting our government’s efforts to deter the Iranians from getting the bomb as enacting a national health insurance system.
• Lanny J. Davis, a Washington lawyer and former special counsel to President Clinton, served as a member of President George W. Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. He is the author of “Scandal: How ‘Gotcha’ Politics is Destroying America.” This piece is also published at http://pundits.thehill.com/author/ lanny-davis.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Proving A Point: Redskins' Bacarri Rambo vows to make impact in second year
- Obama mum on where illegal immigrant children are sheltered
- National laboratory cancels 'Southern Accent Reduction' classes after outcry
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world