Sunnis say crackdown exposes political flaws

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By Jumana al-Tamimi SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates

Iran's repressive behavior following fraud-tainted presidential elections is spreading ripples across the region, leading some Sunni Muslim religious figures and politicians who admire some aspects of Iran's political system to question a core belief of the Islamic republic.

The debate centers on an Iranian institution called the velayet-e faqih, or guardianship of a leading jurist, which for the past 30 years has allowed a Shi'ite Muslim cleric to have the final say on all Iranian foreign and domestic policies.

"During the past 30 years, Iran has been a model for Islamic ruling according to the Shi'ite sect," said Issam al Aryan, a top figure in the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the oldest political Islamic group.

Judging from the June elections and the mass protests that followed, Mr. Aryan said, "Now I believe there is an attempt to move to another stage."

He described it as a transition from the "guardianship of the jurist" to the "guardianship of the people" -- an evolution toward democracy that he said could help bridge the gap between the Sunni and Shi'ite branches of Islam. The Brotherhood is a Sunni organization, and Sunni Muslims are a majority in most Arab countries, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the Iranian revolution in 1979, devised the modern system of clerical rule and became Iran's first supreme leader. Iran's post-revolutionary constitution defines the post as deputy to the 12th or Hidden Imam, a messiahlike figure who devout Shi'ites believe disappeared in the ninth century and will return some day to bring justice to the world.

Sunnis, a majority among the world's 1.3 billion Muslims, do not recognize Shi'ite imams.

Sunni-Shi'ite differences date to 632, after the death of Prophet Muhammad, when his followers split over the question of who should succeed him.

Sunni Muslims supported Abu Bakr, one of the prophet's companions. Others, who later became known as Shi'ites, said the leadership should have stayed within the prophet's family and backed his cousin and son-in-law, Ali.