- Hacking software could put ‘zombie drone army’ in user’s hands
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- 10 whales dead, 41 others stranded in Everglades
- John Boehner faces bipartisan pressure to allow gay-rights vote
- Martin Bashir resigns from MSNBC over ‘ill-judged’ comments about Sarah Palin
- Rep. Duncan Hunter: While Obama prays for Iranian change, U.S. should ready its nukes
- Best company ever? Veteran Beer Co. exists to employ vets, provide quality beer
- Iran official: Sanctions ‘utterly failed’ to stop nuclear program
- ‘Black Santa’ display at IU sparks student outrage
- Joint Chiefs chair Dempsey: Pentagon, VA too slow in merging medical systems
U.S. reviews options after Colombia court voids base agreement
Question of the Day
The Obama administration is exploring its options after the highest court in Colombia — the U.S.’s closest Latin American ally — voided an agreement that would have allowed a continued U.S. military presence at seven bases across the country.
“This is part of a legal process within Colombia,” State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said Wednesday. “We expect it will be resolved in interaction among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of Colombia. We will consult closely with the Colombian government, understand the issues that are involved in this legal matter and look to the Santos government to take appropriate steps to make sure that we can sustain our bilateral relationship.”
Colombia’s Constitutional Court ruled that the agreement could only be ratified if President Juan Manuel Santos, who took office Aug. 7, received legislative approval — a prospect seen as less than likely given the country’s recent efforts to patch up relations with Venezuela.
The quarrelsome neighbors restored diplomatic relations on Aug. 10, following a four-hour meeting between Mr. Santos and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in the Colombian port town of Santa Marta.
Venezuela had severed ties on July 22 after Colombia made a multimedia presentation at the Organization of American States offering evidence that the Chavez government had been harboring anti-government rebels from the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) — a charge Caracas vehemently denied.
News of the basing agreement last year prompted Mr. Chavez to tighten trade restrictions on Colombia that he first imposed in response to its March 2008 airstrikes on a FARC base in Ecuador, a move carried out when Mr. Santos was defense minister under then-President Alvaro Uribe.
As president, Mr. Santos has prioritized restoring trade with Venezuela, which plummeted from $7 billion in 2008 to $2 billion this year. A free-trade agreement between Washington and Bogota, signed in November 2006, has yet to be ratified by the Senate.
Mr. Crowley called the U.S.-Colombia defense relationship “very important” and said that the countries’ shared interests — combating drug trafficking, dealing with threats of terrorism — “aren’t changed because of this court ruling.”
“We expect to be able to continue to cooperate,” he added. “But obviously, we’ll work with Colombia to determine what it plans to do in light of this court ruling.”
Since 2000, under the auspices of “Plan Colombia,” Washington has supplied Bogota roughly $7.3 billion in aid, earmarked primarily for military and counternarcotics purposes.
Mr. Santos expressed optimism Wednesday that the Court’s decision would not adversely affect aid levels, saying that “the consequences of the ruling for the help we have been receiving from the United States are minimal, if not none.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Birnbaum is a reporter covering foreign affairs for The Washington Times. Prior to joining The Times, Birnbaum worked as a reporter-researcher at the New Republic. A Boston-area native, he graduated magna cum laude from Cornell University with a degree in government and psychology. He won multiple collegiate journalism awards for his articles and columns in the Cornell Daily Sun.
By Tom Harris and Madhav Khandekar
Bad science puts rich nations on the hook for trillions in climate liabilities
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Puerto Rico caravan honoring Paul Walker ends in 6 drunken-driving arrests, 72 speeding tickets
- First Dog Sunny knocks down Ashtyn Gardner; Michelle Obama yanks leash
- Martin Bashir resigns from MSNBC over 'ill-judged' comments about Sarah Palin
- EDITORIAL: Motor City meltdown
- Apple wins facial recognition patent for iPhone 6
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- Allen West warns Obamas backdoor gun control is moving forward
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
- Issa: FBI impeding inquiry into IRS targeting of conservative groups
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch