Armenian weapons sales undermine U.S.

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Successive U.S. administrations since the 1979 Islamic revolution have viewed Iran as a dire and existential threat to America and its allies in the Persian Gulf, the broader Middle East and Eurasia. They have thus sought to limit Iran’s military capabilities ever since.

Curtailing arms supplies and military technology to Iran has formed an important part of the U.S. agenda and foreign policy, particularly in light of ongoing U.S. and NATO military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. To its credit, the United States has successfully persuaded most of its allies not to sell arms to the Iranian military or its security apparatus.

To thwart U.S. efforts, Iran has cultivated close relationships with foreign suppliers that are not necessarily allied with the United States. Iran remains reliant on foreign suppliers, such as China, Russia and North Korea to develop its military might. Sadly, it appears that another nation with whom the U.S. has ties, Armenia, can now take its place in the aforementioned list of states supplying the Iranian military with arms.

It is troubling to learn about the recent WikiLeaks disclosure of more than 250,000 diplomatic cables, all apparently from the State Department, which will no doubt have major impact on the United States‘ national security. It is as troubling to learn of Armenia’s transfer of arms to Iran, which reportedly resulted in the death and injury of American troops in Iraq. We now know where Armenia stands, what its preferences are and where its loyalties lie. With a friend like this, who needs enemies?

In December 2008, then-Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte wrote a letter to Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan expressing his concerns about Armenia’s transfer of arms to Iran. In his letter, Mr. Negroponte noted that by law, the transfer of weapons to Iran requires the United States to consider whether there is a basis for sanctions against Armenia. It is important to note that the bills of lading associated with the arms transferred to Iran were signed by none other than then-Defense Minister Serzh Sargysan.

The United States cannot have a trauma of this magnitude and somehow overlook it. Let’s hope Mr. Negroponte’s message is followed up by the Obama administration.


Sherman Oaks, Calif.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts