- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Armenian weapons sales undermine U.S.
Question of the Day
Successive U.S. administrations since the 1979 Islamic revolution have viewed Iran as a dire and existential threat to America and its allies in the Persian Gulf, the broader Middle East and Eurasia. They have thus sought to limit Iran’s military capabilities ever since.
Curtailing arms supplies and military technology to Iran has formed an important part of the U.S. agenda and foreign policy, particularly in light of ongoing U.S. and NATO military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. To its credit, the United States has successfully persuaded most of its allies not to sell arms to the Iranian military or its security apparatus.
To thwart U.S. efforts, Iran has cultivated close relationships with foreign suppliers that are not necessarily allied with the United States. Iran remains reliant on foreign suppliers, such as China, Russia and North Korea to develop its military might. Sadly, it appears that another nation with whom the U.S. has ties, Armenia, can now take its place in the aforementioned list of states supplying the Iranian military with arms.
It is troubling to learn about the recent WikiLeaks disclosure of more than 250,000 diplomatic cables, all apparently from the State Department, which will no doubt have major impact on the United States‘ national security. It is as troubling to learn of Armenia’s transfer of arms to Iran, which reportedly resulted in the death and injury of American troops in Iraq. We now know where Armenia stands, what its preferences are and where its loyalties lie. With a friend like this, who needs enemies?
In December 2008, then-Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte wrote a letter to Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan expressing his concerns about Armenia’s transfer of arms to Iran. In his letter, Mr. Negroponte noted that by law, the transfer of weapons to Iran requires the United States to consider whether there is a basis for sanctions against Armenia. It is important to note that the bills of lading associated with the arms transferred to Iran were signed by none other than then-Defense Minister Serzh Sargysan.
The United States cannot have a trauma of this magnitude and somehow overlook it. Let’s hope Mr. Negroponte’s message is followed up by the Obama administration.
Sherman Oaks, Calif.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
Get Breaking Alerts
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel