- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Question of the Day
Complaint: Rangel paid with PAC funds
A nonprofit group has complained to the Federal Election Commission that censured Democratic Rep. Charles B. Rangel of New York improperly paid legal bills from a political action committee.
The National Legal and Policy Center alleged in the recent complaint that Mr. Rangel’s National Leadership PAC could not be used under FEC rules for the New York Democrat’s legal defense.
Mr. Rangel denied any wrongdoing.
“The National Leadership PAC attorney has authorized the use of its funds for its legal expenses,” he said in a statement. Mr. Rangel said the center is biased against him and added, “A complaint can be filed by any entity and it should not be taken as fact.”
The policy center had accused Mr. Rangel of ethical wrongdoing numerous times during a House ethics investigation that led to his censure last week for financial and fundraising violations. The misconduct at issue in the House proceeding did not involve the legal fee payments.
The center said Mr. Rangel paid $293,000 to his principal defense attorneys from his National Leadership PAC. At least portions of another $100,000 paid to another firm also might have been for his legal defense in that case, the complaint said.
A leadership political action committee is separate from a candidate’s own campaign committee, and is designed to elect other candidates.
Court’s ruling affects vote count
ST. PAUL | Minnesota’s top court has dealt Republican Tom Emmer a setback that could make it harder to sue over the state’s unfinished governor’s race.
The state Supreme Court released an opinion Tuesday that closes off Mr. Emmer’s attempt to disqualify some votes in the race. The court last month had rejected his petition to make local officials match the number of votes and voters using polling place rosters.
The court had ruled without releasing its reasoning. Mr. Emmer had been waiting for the opinion as he weighs whether to pursue a lawsuit over the election in his race with Democrat Mark Dayton.
Mr. Emmer is certain to lose a recount, given a large vote deficit and relatively few remaining ballots for a state board to go over. Mr. Dayton led by almost 9,000 votes.
TWT Video Picks
By Scott Pinsker
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll - Washington Times#.U9ZSgi7-CXU.twi
- Ohio sheriff sends bill to Mexico for cost of jailing illegals
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq