U.S. drone strikes come under U.N. fire

Obama expands ‘targeted killings’

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

President Obama’s drone war in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen is coming under fire from the United Nations.

Philip Alston, the independent U.N. investigator on extrajudicial killings, reported Wednesday that the United States exercises the “most prolific use of targeted killings.” He added that 40 countries have drone technology and some are seeking the technology to place a missile on the drones so the unmanned aerial vehicles can be used for targeted killings.

“I’m particularly concerned that the United States seems oblivious to this fact when it asserts an ever-expanding entitlement for itself to target individuals across the globe,” Mr. Alston said in a statement that accompanied his report.

Mr. Obama has expanded the use of the Predator and Reaper drones in the war against al Qaeda. Drone attacks in Pakistan expanded in August 2008 after an execute order was signed by President George W. Bush in July of that year.

Mr. Obama has not only expanded the technically secret program, but responsibility for the drone attacks in Pakistan has been handed over to the CIA, which does not operate under the same laws of armed conflict as the U.S. military.

“Without discussing or confirming any specific action or program, this agency’s operations unfold within a framework of law and close government oversight,” said CIA spokesman George Little. “The accountability’s real, and it would be wrong for anyone to suggest otherwise.”

Mr. Alston’s report suggests there are serious questions about the drone program.

To start, his report says there appears to be no geographic boundaries to U.S. drone strikes, creating what some have called the “law of 9/11,” a reference to the authorization of military force by Congress on Sept. 14, 2001, three days after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

That authorization allows the president “to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.”

Harold Koh, the State Department’s legal adviser, said in a speech in March that the authorization allows the United States to use force throughout the world to target members of al Qaeda. He has justified the policy as a form of self-defense, based on the fact that al Qaeda and the United States are in armed conflict.

However, Mr. Alston said this is not clear. He pointed out that a Senate Foreign Relations Committee report in 2009 found that some targets in Afghanistan included drug traffickers, who should not be considered the same as armed combatants.

Part of the problem, Mr. Alston said, is that there is no overarching international law designed specifically for targeted killings. For example, international humanitarian law requires only that such targeted attacks do not target civilians disproportionately.

Mr. Koh said in his speech in March that U.S. strikes also make sure the attacks are limited to military objectives.

In his statement, Mr. Alston warned that the U.S. use of drones could encourage other countries to follow the American example.

“This strongly asserted but ill-defined license to kill without accountability is not an entitlement which the United States or other states can have without doing grave damage to the rules designed to protect the right to life and prevent extrajudicial executions,” he said.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks