- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
McChrystal resigns Afghan command
Petraeus tapped as replacement following interview controversy
Question of the Day
“I am extraordinarily grateful that he has agreed to serve in this new capacity,” said Mr. Obama, adding he was doing so “at great personal sacrifice to himself and to his family,” and was “setting an extraordinary example of service and patriotism by assuming this difficult post.”
Senate hearings have been scheduled for next Tuesday.
The Petraeus nomination was “a politically very savvy move,” Mr. Finel said, because “it should neutralize any criticism from the right. He is the master of counterinsurgency.”
Nonetheless, while personally praising Gen. Petraeus, some Republicans voiced their anxiety about the task he was taking on, given the escalating violence in Afghanistan and what some regard as an arbitrary and dangerous deadline set by the president to begin withdrawing U.S. troops next summer.
“General Petraeus is an outstanding military leader,” said Sen. Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Republican and the ranking member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, “but even he can’t win in Afghanistan if the president continues to insist on an arbitrary withdrawal date — a fact our enemies are counting on and our allies fear.”
Mr. Finel said the timeline the president demanded would be “easy to fudge.”
“You send one brigade home, but you extend a couple of others and before you know it, you have as many troops there as ever,” he said.
He added that, having been asked by the president to take what is in many ways a step down, Gen. Petraeus would have “tremendous leverage.”
“It will be very, very hard to refuse him anything he asks,” Mr. Finel said, adding that he expected a “shake up of senior people in Kabul, with a number of people who were close to McChrystal [leaving.]”
Though his words were far more politic than Gen. McChrystal’s, Gen. Petraeus told Congress at a hearing last week that Mr. Obama’s July 2011 target date to start pulling U.S. forces from Afghanistan should be put off until the security situation in Afghanistan was ready to handle such a pullout.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Red Alert focuses on the hottest political topics in the nation and calls Americans to action.
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
White House pets gone wild!