- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Carbon tax seen as hurdle to energy bill
Senators huddle with Obama, but parties remain far apart
Question of the Day
Democratic and Republican senators alike on Tuesday said they want to move forward with a clean-energy bill, but even after a meeting with President Obama there were few signs the lawmakers will be able to bridge a long-standing impasse over putting a price on carbon emissions.
Key Senate Democrats emerged from the meeting, which included 23 senators from both sides of the aisle, saying they’ll still try to make companies pay for carbon pollution - a concept that’s a nonstarter with most Republicans, who say it’s tantamount to a tax on consumers. The White House said Mr. Obama told the lawmakers he supports pricing carbon but most importantly wants to see action this year on measures both sides can agree upon.
“As long as we take a national energy tax off the table, there’s no reason we can’t have clean-energy legislation,” Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander told reporters at the White House.
The Tennessee Republican said the GOP is willing to work with Democrats on a scaled-down bill that would include the goals of electrifying half of the nation’s vehicles over the next 20 years; building more nuclear power plants; and boosting investments in energy research and development.
The chief authors of Senate Democrats’ energy bill said they are willing to seek a compromise with Republicans, but stood firm on the need to put a price on carbon, raising questions about just how a compromise can be achieved.
“An energy-only bill - we have passed 10 of them since Richard Nixon was president,” Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, said. “None of those bills have done the job. An energy-only bill will produce one-tenth the number of jobs, and it will result in one-tenth the reduction in emissions.”
Nevertheless, Mr. Kerry said he and co-author Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent, are “prepared to scale back the reach of our legislation in order to try to find that place of compromise.”
In the aftermath of the BP oil spill, Mr. Obama in recent weeks has repeatedly called for a comprehensive energy bill that would help wean the nation off fossil fuels. But in his public comments he has not delved into the specifics of what he’d like to see in such a measure.
In a readout of the meeting Tuesday, the White House said Mr. Obama “told the senators he still believes the best way for us to transition to a clean-energy economy is with a bill that makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses by putting a price on pollution.”
The House last summer passed a broad bill that would impose a cap-and-trade approach to global warming, but the Senate has struggled to come up with a similar measure that could garner the 60 votes needed for consideration.
Mr. Lieberman said some Republicans who have been publicly reluctant about the idea of pricing carbon said in the meeting that they would be willing to discuss “limited forms of doing that in this bill,” though he didn’t elaborate, and no Republicans mentioned such an idea.
Sen. Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, one of the Republicans whose votes Democrats would likely require to move ahead, said Tuesday now is not the right time to pursue an “economy-wide” approach on carbon reduction, given the weak economy.
“The bottom line is that this should be an era of practicality, given our economic situation - and whatever Congress pursues should be viewed through that prism, to develop legislation that is pragmatic, reduces uncertainty, and creates business opportunities for a carbon-free economy of the future, without further harming our economy of today,” Mrs. Snowe said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kara Rowland, White House reporter for The Washington Times, is a D.C.-area native. She graduated from the University of Virginia, where she studied American government and spent nearly all her waking hours working as managing editor of the Cavalier Daily, UVa.’s student newspaper.
Her interest in political reporting was piqued by an internship at Roll Call the summer before her ...
- London Olympics not everyone's cup of tea
- Obama hits road to push jobs plan
- Brennan: Al Qaeda is 'organization in distress'
- Obama calls for the end of 'political circus' on economy, seeks stimulus plan for jobs
- Hoffa's words about labor's importance brushed off
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- ORTEL: Note to Janet Yellen: The American bubble is popping
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq