Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close

Critics see peril in voting-machine merger

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Sen. Charles E. Schumer has raised concerns about the deal in which Election Systems & Software Inc. of Omaha, Neb., bought the voting-machine subsidiary of Diebold Inc. of North Canton, Ohio.ASSOCIATED PRESS Sen. Charles E. Schumer has raised concerns about the deal in which Election Systems & Software Inc. of Omaha, Neb., bought the voting-machine subsidiary of Diebold Inc. of North Canton, Ohio.
Social Networks
facebookFacebook
twitterTwitter
Question of the Day

Will you be affected by Hurricane Earl?

View results

The largest voting-machine company in the country bought its biggest competitor six months ago without advance notice and little fanfare. Now the Justice Department is investigating whether to unwind the merger that put a privately held Nebraska company in control of the voting machines in nearly 70 percent of the nation's precincts.

With midterm elections looming, a coalition of election officials from several states and voter advocate groups is pressing the Justice Department to unscramble the combination of two companies. Critics say the merger could cause foul-ups at the polls on Election Day, and some even characterize it as a national security risk.

Senate Rules Committee Chairman Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, has already raised concerns about the purchase, in which Election Systems & Software Inc. (ES&S;) of Omaha, Neb., bought the voting-machine subsidiary of Diebold Inc. of North Canton, Ohio.

"In the voting-systems industry, perhaps more than any other, the failure of the market can affect the public interest in a way that goes to the heart of our democracy," Mr. Schumer said in a letter urging Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to scrutinize the deal.

The emergence of one megaplayer in the electronic-voting-machine industry may be an unintended consequence of reforms enacted after the presidential election debacle in Florida a decade ago.

Few companies can afford to get into the business owing to the expense of developing the electronic voting safeguards that reformers insisted on in the wake of the confusion and controversy surrounding the final vote tallies for Democrat Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush.

The Justice Department's antitrust division is doing a post-merger review that could result in the government's trying to persuade ES&S; to sell off some of its assets or face a court suit to force a sell-off. An announcement could come soon.

ES&S; said it has been cooperating with the division's review.

"We are committed to exploring potential resolutions that will address any concerns about this transaction, while ensuring that the election-services needs of the jurisdictions we serve will be met," a company statement said.

Separate from the Obama administration's review, competing voting-machine firm Hart InterCivic Inc. has sued ES&S;, charging that the company will now supply voting machines in 68.2 percent of the nation's voting precincts. The New York State Board of Elections urged the Justice Department and the New York state attorney general to intervene in the lawsuit challenging the acquisition.

Story Continues →

Not Registered Yet?

Comment on articles. Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts. Sign up today.

Happening Now

Click for more stories

Most Read

    Independent voices from the TWT Communities

    A Parent in America

    Discussion of timely issues that affect families -- served with a side of humor.

    Riffs

    Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

    Curtain Up!

    Classical music and the performing arts: news and reviews you can use