- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- Ukraine will compete in Sochi Paralympics despite Crimea conflict
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
Iraqi election violence may sway U.S. stay
Iraq faces the prospect of a protracted battle to form a new government after Sunday elections, including possible violence, that could complicate President Obama’s plans to pull out nearly half the U.S. troops there by the end of August, diplomats and analysts say.
An early round of voting Thursday was marred by three explosions that killed more than a dozen people, even as Iraqi security forces were out in full force trying to protect polling stations.
“Terrorists wanted to hamper the elections; thus, they started to blow themselves up in the streets,” Deputy Interior Minister Ayden Khalid Qader told reporters in Baghdad.
Observers of Iraqi politics say they have no idea who will win the elections and what kind of government will emerge from the results. The only certainty, they say, is that the voting will be highly contested, with about 6,200 candidates running for 325 seats in parliament.
“Nobody knows who’s going to win,” said Brett McGurk, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a National Security Council official in the George W. Bush White House. “We are not going to know really what’s happened until probably three weeks or so after the elections, when the votes are certified.”
Those results, however, will simply “set up a protracted negotiation that’s going to take not weeks, but months - and perhaps many months,” Mr. McGurk said.
Meghan O’Sullivan, a former White House colleague of Mr. McGurk’s and now a professor at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, said it is “possible that on Sunday one party will emerge with a significantly larger bloc of votes than the others,” but that is “extremely unlikely.”
While political alliances continue to shift, six main coalitions are vying for support from the 19 million registered voters: the Iraqi National Alliance, which includes major Shiite parties; the State of Law coalition, led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, also a Shiite but running as a secular and nationalist figure; the Iraqi National Movement, an alliance of secular Shiite parties and nationalist Sunnis; the Kurdistan Alliance and the competing Kurdish party Change List; and the Unity of Iraq Coalition, with more than 40 entities.
“The situation is extremely confusing concerning the party alliances,” said Marina Ottaway, director of the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “It is extremely likely that they will break up and reconfigure after the elections.”
Ms. O’Sullivan said that, although “you don’t have parties that are exclusively sectarian in nature,” as was the case in the 2005 elections, the likely “vacuum” the protracted government negotiations will create could invite violence.
“If you don’t have a government until late spring or early summer,” that could affect the pullout of U.S. troops, she said.
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said the level of about 96,000 troops will hold “through the elections and in the weeks following, so that we can be on hand to assist in providing for a security environment conducive for a peaceful transfer of power.”
“But once that has been established, we are prepared to draw down dramatically to get to the president’s goal of 50,000 U.S. forces on the ground come Sept. 1,” Mr. Morrell said Wednesday.
Iraqi security forces “have the lead in providing security” during the elections, and “all indications are that they are more than prepared to pull it off,” Mr. Morrell said.
Under the U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement, which the Bush administration negotiated in 2008, all combat forces must withdraw by the end of June and all troops must leave by the end of 2011.
About the Author
Nicholas Kralev is The Washington Times’ diplomatic correspondent. His travels around the world with four secretaries of state — Hillary Rodham Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright — as well as his other reporting overseas trips inspired his new weekly column, “On the Fly.” He is a former writer for the weekend edition of the Financial Times and ...
- State Department to increase 'nonimmigrant' visa fees
- State Department to increase 'nonimmigrant' visa fees
- International court's progress slow
- International court since '02 hasn't rushed to any judgments
- Chile holds Pakistani after U.S. pulls visa
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- CPAC 2014: Huckabee says government impeding religious liberty
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again