- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
Democrats to push for end of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ now
Question of the Day
The push to end the policy barring openly gay men and women from serving in the military has new life on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers have announced plans to push forward with their efforts despite opposition from most Republicans.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent, told reporters Thursday that the repeal effort and the policy’s “injustice” was “alive and well,” and Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada vowed to hold vote on the proposal before the end of the lame-duck session, which could run into December.
“Our Defense Department supports repealing ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ as a way to build our all-volunteer armed forces,” Mr. Reid said. “We need to repeal this discriminatory policy so that any American who wants to defend our country can do so.”
Mr. Reid wants to attach the repeal onto the Defense Authorization Act, the blueprint for military spending. He told reporters that his proposed repeal would only go into effect after the Pentagon finishes a review of repeal implications and after President Obama, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ensure it will not hurt the military’s readiness.
All three men support the repeal. That report is scheduled to be released Dec. 1.
Republicans, however, say time is running out on the 111th Congress and that any repeal likely will be crowded out other business, ranging from the proposed extension of the Bush-era tax cuts to spending bills that must be dealt with in order to keep the federal government operating beyond Dec. 3.
Donald Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, also suggested that proponents of the plan likely would not have the votes needed to shepherd the bill forward.
“They didn’t have the 60 votes before the election,” he said, alluding to the threshold needed to push the bill onto the Senate floor for a vote.
Considered must-pass legislation, the defense policy bill became a catch-all for many issues left on the table as Congress tackled health care, financial regulations and spending to try to create jobs.
Among them was a controversial provision, known as The DREAM Act, that would grant citizenship to some children of illegal immigrants and the military’s policy on homosexuality, which was established under President Clinton nearly two decades ago.
But Democrats’ pre-election effort to pass gay rights fell victim to a Republican-led filibuster in September.
Republicans have argued then and now that tacking these proposals onto the defense bill was an election year ploy and that both the repeal and The DREAM Act issue should be taken up separately.
Others, including Sen. Susan Collins, Maine Republican, argued that it was wrong for Democrats to block Republicans from offering amendments to the defense bill.
Many Republicans wanted to debate amendments on how the nation would handle trials for suspected terrorists, and also wanted a chance to try to strike language that would allow military hospitals to provide abortions to women willing to pay for them.
Asked whether Ms. Collins, the ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee, would support a repeal effort, her spokesman, Kevin Kelley, said “she wanted to vote for the defense authorization bill and supports the repeal.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- IRS nominee gets GOP support
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Club for Growth: Budget deal could hurt GOP incumbents on Election Day
- Obama's IRS nominee John Koskinen vows to restore public trust in agency
Latest Blog Entries
- Tea Party Patriots: Congress will break promise of future deficit reduction
- Speaker John Boehner escalates clash with conservative critics of budget deal
- Sen. Lamar Alexander's chief of staff involved in child pornography probe
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Sen. Bill Nelson downplays handshake between Obama, Castro
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- N. Korean news agency: Kim Jong Un's uncle executed
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow