- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
Queen Elizabeth II doing her part to save on energy
Snuggie for queen? Palace solar panels?
Question of the Day
LONDON — Forget Marie Antoinette, who, when told that peasants had no bread, apocryphally said: “Let them eat cake.”
Noblesse oblige? Call it the thrift of the throne.
The queen is learning how to pinch a pence.
“The attention is drawn to all members of staff to the need to switch off unwanted lights - By Order of The Master of The Household,” they read, according to the Financial Times, which also reported that the 85-year-old queen routinely totters around the palace turning off lamps.
Britain’s monarch probably was not considered when the Conservative-led government committed itself to eradicating “fuel poverty” - households that spend more than 10 percent of their annual income on heating and lighting - by 2016.
But soaring energy costs and an inconvenient freeze on royal funding by the government have left Queen Elizabeth close to joining her 5 million subjects in that classification.
Bills for heating and lighting four historic palaces and a castle are costing the queen an increasing percentage of her $50 million annual income. Last year, the royal electricity and gas bill was $3.4 million - about 7 percent of the monarchial income.
With the funding freeze in effect, further price increases could push the queen’s spending on energy to 10 percent of her income, placing the United Kingdom’s head of state into fuel poverty.
Even so, Queen Elizabeth would have an annual income far beyond that of the average Briton, who earned about $40,000 this year. But in case she is worried, her subjects and tourists in London are suggesting ways trim the royal budget.
Rent a room
The rent: $46,000 a day, according to the Daily Mail.
Londoners note that Her Majesty has larger and swankier digs that would fetch a pretty farthing as rental properties.
Buckingham Palace, which has served as the official London residence of Britain’s sovereigns since 1837, has 775 rooms - including 19 state rooms, 52 royal and guest bedrooms, 188 staff bedrooms, 92 offices and 78 bathrooms.
A one-bedroom apartment featuring a shared tennis court around the corner from the palace is on the rental market for $1,300 a week, or $67,600 a year. Multiplied by 10 renters, the resulting income could cover a fifth of last year’s royal fuel bill.
Sell a castle
Many of the properties occupied by the royal family are, in fact, owned by the state.
However, the queen does own Sandringham House in Norfolk and Balmoral Castle in Scotland, among others. She could save on their upkeep - and turn a nice profit - by selling one or more of them.
Parting with a property that has been in the family for several generations likely would be emotionally wrenching, but it also might ease any financial stress caused by rising fuel bills.
Forbes reported in 2001 that Sandringham and Balmoral together were worth $150 million. Given that average property prices in the United Kingdom have doubled over the past 10 years, those estates likely would be worth $300 million today.
Braving almost freezing temperatures outside Buckingham Palace, visitors and tourists offered a few ideas of their own.
Stephen Geary, 42, and his mother, Joyce, 76, from London, suggested that Her Majesty could save energy costs by installing solar panels on the roof and ditching her fleet of Rolls-Royces for subway travel.
“Selling off castles should be a last resort, but she should make every effort she can to set a good example by not being too extravagant,” said Amy, 42. “That would be good for the country.”
Keagan Brewer, 24, from Australia, said Her Majesty could save on water bills by turning off the tap while she soaps herself in the shower, before turning it back on to rinse.
His friend Whitney Gresham, 22, suggested that the queen could shower with a friend to save on the water bill. “She should get a Prius, sack a few butlers and use candles instead of electric lights - it would be more romantic,” the Californian said.
Another Californian - Lori Lindsay, 43, of San Francisco - offered a frugal tip: Don’t flush the toilet unless absolutely necessary.
“We have water shortages in California and we have an expression, ‘If it’s yellow, keep it mellow; if it’s brown, flush it down,” said Mrs. Lindsay, who was visiting with her young family.
“That’s disgusting,” said her husband, Eddie, 45, originally from Northern Ireland. “It’s terrible that the austerity measures are hitting middle and lower classes while bankers are still getting bonuses, even though they’ve been bailed out by the taxpayer, when some people can’t afford food and heating.”
The queen may be spending a greater chunk of her income on heating and lighting, but it’s unlikely she will reuse tea bags or eat leftovers for breakfast anytime soon.
Meanwhile, the British government is considering a new definition of fuel poverty that would eliminate wealthy households by assessing whether fuel costs push income below the poverty line.
Funding freeze or not, the queen’s income easily remains above that threshold - unless more austerity is to come.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson: Gays 'wont inherit the kingdom of God'
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Nobody likes to talk about dying. But we can help.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow