Senate strikes at ethanol handout

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Signaling that austerity is now the prevailing attitude on Capitol Hill, the Senate delivered a stunning blow to a once-sacrosanct program Thursday when it voted to end billions of dollars that go each year to producers of blended ethanol.

Reversing itself from just two days earlier and despite opposition from the White House, a bipartisan coalition voted 73-27 to halt the 45-cents-per-gallon tax credit, which was expected to total $5.7 billion in 2011.

Coming from the Senate, which had previously taken a slower approach to budget trimming, it pointed to a potential sweet spot for future bipartisan cuts: the hundreds of other special-interest breaks that line the tax code. It also showed that lawmakers may be fed up with the billions of dollars paid out to support farmers each year.

“This is going to be the first of many coming down the line. We’ve got to change the way we carry out business,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, who led the charge to end the subsidy, along with Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican.

“We might as well get used to it now,” she said.

In the House, meanwhile, lawmakers approved legislation that blocks federal dollars from paying for special pumps to blend ethanol — something ethanol backers said is needed to produce a big enough market to make the product worthwhile.

A similar amendment failed in the Senate, though, suggesting that while tax credits to companies are on the outs, continued spending on infrastructure projects that facilitate alternative energy may still have staying power.

Thursday’s Senate vote was more symbolic than substantive. The bill itself cannot succeed because the ethanol provisions affect taxes, and the Constitution requires all revenue bills to originate in the House.

Still, it was striking that Democratic caucus members outnumbered Republicans 40-33 in voting for the cuts. Of the 27 opponents, more than half were Republicans, which seemed to conflict with the party’s message of lowering federal spending.

Democrats said it put those 33 Republicans on record in support of ending at least some corporate giveaways. Democrats said that shows so-called “tax expenditures” should be on the table in talks over a broad debt-reduction deal.

Ahead of the vote, Corn Belt lawmakers pleaded for a go-slow approach, asking that the tax credits be trimmed down rather than cut off as of July 1. They said farmers and blenders have made decisions based on the credit’s availability, and that a sudden cutoff would be unfair.

“The question is not if we should do it — we will — but when, and how,” said Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota Democrat, who was trying to craft such a slow-transition proposal. She said she will keep working and hopes to reach a deal with Mrs. Feinstein and Mr. Coburn before final action.

President Obama has defended ethanol supports, and the White House said he is opposed to “full repeal of that subsidy.”

“We would like to see reform that would reduce costs in terms of the subsidy in question here, but we did not support the full repeal,” press secretary Jay Carney said.

Ethanol is considered renewable because it is derived from crops. In the U.S., ethanol is usually derived from corn, which some studies show is an inefficient method. Other countries, such as Brazil, produce ethanol more efficiently from cane sugar.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks