The GOP presidential field is firming up, and all the major White House hopefuls have something in common besides a desire to defeat President Obama: Each has on his resume a violation of conservative orthodoxy certain to anger primary voters.
Whether it’s backing state health care, approving tax increases or supporting initiatives driven by climate change, the top candidates have baggage that will have some Republicans swallowing hard in the voting booth.
“Every candidate in the field has a question that has to be answered with the Republican primary voters, and how each of them answers that question that pertains to them in the mind of voters is going to be very important,” said GOP strategist Ed Gillespie, a former Republican National Committee chairman. “That is part of the testing process. That’s part of what forges winning candidates.”
The field is defined as much by who has passed on a run as by who is in or still considering it.
Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels announced Sunday that he would forgo a bid, following in the footsteps of Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Rep. Mike Pence and billionaire businessman Donald Trump.
That leaves a field where it seems the bigger the name, the more questions there are.
Many Republican voters want to know why former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who announced his bid last week, criticized on national TV the House GOP’s plan to reshape Medicare and why former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., another potential contender, was willing to represent the Obama administration for nearly two years as U.S. ambassador to China.
Meanwhile, Mitt Romney, who has formed an exploratory committee, is dogged by the universal health care program he signed into law as governor of Massachusetts, and c, who officially kicked off his campaign Monday, has been criticized for supporting a regional “cap-and-trade” program on greenhouse gases as governor of Minnesota.
Orthodoxy concerns dog others already in the race or considering a run, including the call by Rep. Ron Paul of Texas for retrenchment of troops involved in military operations overseas and support for states interested in legalizing marijuana; former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson’s pro-choice stand on abortion, albeit with restrictions; former corporate executive Herman Cain’s lack of a political track record; and Rep. Michele Bachmann’s habit of shooting rhetorical bombs from the hip.
“Nobody is excited about anybody,” Mr. Frederick said. “They are still looking, and it’s pretty bad when there are plenty of candidates out there to choose from.”
Mr. Gillespie shrugged off the criticism of the field and said that whoever the nominee is will be capable of defeating Mr. Obama.
“Everybody always wants more choices, but I think the choices are before us, and I think the choices are good,” he said.
Meanwhile, some of the candidates have offered explanations - even apologies - in an attempt to diminish the blemishes on their records that threaten to undermine their 2012 candidacies.
For instance, Mr. Romney delivered an entire speech May 12 designed to answer questions about the universal health care law he signed as governor of Massachusetts, saying it was a constitutionally acceptable policy experiment by a state, while casting Mr. Obama’s health care overhaul as an unconstitutional power grab by Washington.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
An establishmentarian conservative, short on cash, but long on wisdom.
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
News and opinion from a Millennial Urbanite with Southern sensibilities,
World's Ugliest Dog Contest
Spelling Bee finale
Marines train Afghan soldiers
Rolling Thunder 2013
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal