Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Iraq prime minister: Immunity issue scuttled U.S. troop deal

** FILE ** In this Tuesday, July 13, 2010, file photo, U.S. Army soldiers from 2nd Brigade, 10th Mountain Division board a C-17 aircraft at Baghdad International Airport as they begin their journey to the United States. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo, File)** FILE ** In this Tuesday, July 13, 2010, file photo, U.S. Army soldiers from 2nd Brigade, 10th Mountain Division board a C-17 aircraft at Baghdad International Airport as they begin their journey to the United States. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo, File)
** FILE ** In this Saturday, April 12, 2011, file photo, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki speaks during an interview with the Associated Press at his office in the heavily protected Green Zone in Baghdad, Iraq. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim, File)** FILE ** In this Saturday, April 12, 2011, file photo, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki speaks during an interview with the Associated Press at his office in the heavily protected Green Zone in Baghdad, Iraq. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim, File)

BAGHDAD (AP) — Iraq’s prime minister said Saturday that U.S. troops are leaving Iraq after nearly nine years of war because Baghdad rejected American demands that any U.S. military forces to stay would have to be shielded from prosecution or lawsuits.

The comments by Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, made clear that it was Iraq who refused to let the U.S. military remain under the Americans’ terms.

A day earlier, President Barack Obama had hailed the troops’ withdrawal as the result of his commitment — promised shortly after taking office in 2009 — to end the war that he once described as “dumb.”

“When the Americans asked for immunity, the Iraqi side answered that it was not possible,” al-Maliki told reporters in Baghdad. “The discussions over the number of trainers and the place of training stopped. Now that the issue of immunity was decided and that no immunity to be given, the withdrawal has started.”

Nearly 40,000 U.S. troops remain in Iraq, all of whom will withdraw by Dec. 31 — a deadline set in a 2008 security agreement between Baghdad and Washington.

But continued violence across Iraq, coupled with growing influence by the Shiite power Iran over the government in Baghdad, prompted the Obama administration earlier this year to push to keep thousands of U.S. troops here for years to come. The two nations negotiated for months over whether U.S. forces should stay — a politically delicate issue for Obama and al-Maliki, both of whom faced widespread opposition from their respective publics to continue a war that was never popular in either nation.

U.S. officials, from Obama to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, stressed that Washington will continue to have a strong diplomatic relationship with Baghdad despite the absence of military forces to help guide Iraq to stability.

Washington has long worried that Iranian meddling in Iraq could inflame Sunni tensions with Iraq’s Shiite-led government and set off a chain reaction of violence and disputes across the Mideast.

In an interview released Saturday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that Tehran has “a very good relationship” with Iraq’s government, and that this relationship will continue to grow.

“We have deepened our ties day by day,” Ahmadinejad said in an interview broadcast Saturday with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria.

Al-Maliki told reporters he still wants American help in training Iraqi forces to use billions of dollars worth of military equipment that Baghdad is buying from the United States. He did not say if the prospective U.S. trainers would be active-duty troops, and said any immunity deals for them would have to be worked out in the future.

About 160 U.S. troops will remain at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad to help oversee training plans — a duty that is common at most American diplomatic posts worldwide.

Michael O’Hanlon, an expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington said continued violence in Iraq was always a threat, whether or not U.S. troops remain.

“But it’s true that their frequency may increase absent U.S. help in areas of intelligence and special operations,” said O’Hanlon, who was among a group of Bush administration officials and academics who called on Obama to keep a robust U.S. force in Iraq. “In addition, I do fear the residual risk of civil war goes up with this decision, as the north in particular will become more fraught.”

___

Associated Press Writers Bushra Juhi and Sameer N. Yacoub contributed to this report.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential candidates, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, right, and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum argue a point during a presidential debate Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2012, in Mesa, Ariz. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

    Rivals target Santorum in debate

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** Newt Gingrich (Associated Press)

    Gingrich campaign warned 2nd time for financial dealings

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • FILE - This May 24, 2010 file photo show the exterior of Solyndra Inc. in Fremont, Calif. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

    Bonuses given after raises at Solyndra

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Champion's Heart

          A wife, mother of three and world waterskiing champion looks at the world through the eyes of her faith.

          Tango of Mind and Emotion

          Notes for nurturing and understanding mental-emotional health.

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.