- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
MOVIE REVIEW: ‘Amigo’
War film wins by not taking sides
Question of the Day
John Sayles‘ “Amigo” is a war movie that doesn’t take sides - except against war itself.
Set in a tiny village during the Philippine-American War near the start of the 20th century, it’s equally critical of American violence toward the locals and Filipino rebel cruelty toward their own people. Even more surprisingly, it’s equally sympathetic to the soldiers caught up in the battle on both sides - leaders and grunts alike.
Mr. Sayles‘ decision to humanize both sides is the film’s greatest strength, but may also be its most glaring weakness. Clever, unassuming, and determinedly understated, its biggest flaw may be its commitment to announcing its own evenhandedness.
For the first few minutes, “Amigo” plays like a quiet riff on Mel Gibson’s Mayan action epic, “Apocalypto.” Like Mr. Gibson’s self-financed, subtitled film, “Amigo” starts with a fond depiction of simple village life, this time in the Phillipines around 1900. Although a war surrounds them, the villagers carry on with their lives. They tend crops, raise families, and squabble as small communities inevitably do.
Most of all, however, they want to avoid entangling themselves in the violent rebellion raging through their country. Rafael (Joel Torre), the town’s tax collector and unofficial leader, has already seen his brother join the rebels.
It doesn’t take long, however, before the war comes to them. American soldiers barge into Rafael’s village on the hunt for a rebel general. Soon, Rafael finds himself torn between the two sides - his brother’s rebel forces, and the American troops who’ve occupied his town.
An independent filmmaker with a long history of low-key, low-budget critical successes, Mr. Sayles has never been a particularly energetic director. And despite “Amigo’s” wartime setting, and the presence of a few violent sequences, he maintains his typically unruffled approach. He’s a lot more concerned with capturing the nuances of what people say than the visceral chaos of battle.
Mr. Sayles has always been more of a wordsmith than a visualist. He finances his films partly by working as one of Hollywood’s highly-paid, behind-the-scenes script-doctors (he did rewrites on “Apollo 13” and a script that eventually became “E.T.”). So it’s no surprise that “Amigo’s” story is both carefully structured and lined with clever dialogue.
His perfectly picked cast certainly helps. Mr. Torre gives Rafael a sense of a tired community devotion that’s mirrored by Garrett Delahunt, the American lieutenant stuck commanding the local troops, who walks a tightrope between the conflicting calls of decency and duty. Chris Cooper lends his squinty eyes and suppressed ferocity to a cameo role as a callous American commander.
Occasionally, Mr. Sayles leans too heavily on repetitious, film-school literary techniques. The first time he cross-cuts between rebel forces and their American counterparts to suggest their many similarities, it comes across as a nice, if slightly obvious, editing-room touch. The third time, it comes across like a politician who can only repeat the same talking point.
Still, it’s a point that may bear repeating. There are few winners in war. But it does sometimes make for good movies - and “Amigo” is one of them.
CREDITS: Written and directed by John Sayles
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Chris Matthews: GOP less patriotic than South African white apartheid leaders
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'Economic Freedom Zones' for Detroit
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
White House pets gone wild!