Uncensored WikiLeaks cables posted to Web

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

LONDON (AP) — Uncensored copies of WikiLeaks’ massive tome of U.S. State Department cables circulated freely Thursday across the Internet, leaving a whole new batch of U.S. sources vulnerable to embarrassment and potential retribution.

In the United States, the U.S. State Department denied ever cooperating with the anti-secrecy group, and blasted Wikileaks for allegedly threatening national security and the safety of confidential informants.

WikiLeaks has blamed the British newspaper the Guardian for the breach, saying that an investigative journalist had revealed the password needed to unlock the files in a book published earlier this year. Guardian journalists countered that it was sloppy security at Julian Assange’s anti-secrecy website that helped expose the cables to the world.

In a 1,600-word-long editorial posted to the Internet, WikiLeaks accused Guardian investigative reporter David Leigh of betrayal, saying that his disclosure had jeopardized months of “careful work” that WikiLeaks had undertaken to redact and publish the cables.

“Revolutions and reforms are in danger of being lost as the unpublished cables spread to intelligence contractors and governments before the public,” WikiLeaks said in its statement.

Mr. Leigh and the Guardian both denied wrongdoing, and the exact sequence of events WikiLeaks was referring to remained clouded in confusion and recriminations.

It has long been known that WikiLeaks lost control of the raw cables even before they were published. One copy of the secret documents leaked to the New York Times in the fall of 2010, and other media organizations, including the Associated Press, have since received copies independently of WikiLeaks.

But never before has the entire catalog of unredacted cables made its way to the Web.

Until recently, WikiLeaks released relatively small batches of files to its partner organizations — dozens of international media and human rights groups — so they could remove information that could put innocent people in jeopardy. Only then were the files posted online.

But with the unredacted cables now sloshing around in the public domain, all that work effectively has been thrown out the window.

In its statement, WikiLeaks laid the blame on the Guardian and an unnamed “German individual.”

Mr. Leigh, however, told the AP that WikiLeaks’ assertion was “time-wasting nonsense.”

He acknowledged that Mr. Assange had supplied him with a password needed to access the U.S. Embassy cables from a server back in July 2010 — but said that Mr. Assange told him the site would expire within a matter of hours.

“What we published much later in our book was obsolete and harmless,” Mr. Leigh said in an email. “We did not disclose the URL (web address) where the file was located, and in any event, Assange had told us it would no longer exist.”

Mr. Leigh added, “I don’t see how a member of the public could access such a file anyway, unless a WikiLeaks or ex-WikiLeaks person tells them where it is located and what the file was called.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks